THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Girikanta Das, Son of Guluk Chandra Das – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt. of Assam, Fishery Department and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.4355 of 2025
Decided On : 04-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievance about tender process (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. supreme court standards for tender compliance (Para 4) |
| 3. nits invalid due to legal non-compliance (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. liberty to initiate fresh tender process (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. H. Ali, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. P. Sarma, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 & 4 and Mr. M. Chetia, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the action on the part of the respondent authorities in calling for a fresh tender on 22.07.2025 through the respondent No. 2.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner participated in the tender process initiated vide the NIT dated 04.06.2025. The petitioner had reasons to believe that the petitioner was the highest bidder and was expecting that the fishery in question would be settled with the petitioner. However, the respondent No. 2 had issued a fresh tender dated 22.07.2025 in respect of the said fishery.
4. When the matter was taken up at the stage of motion, Mr. P. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Fishery Department, placed before this Court an Office Order dated 10.07.2025 issued by the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Fishery Department, wherein it has been categorically mentioned that the directions passed by the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Teteliguri Navajyoti Matsyajibi S.S. Ltd. vs. State of Assam & Others dated 21.05.2025 have to be adhered to, and any omission or lapse in complying with the said directions would render the NIT in question invalid. The contents of the said Office Order are reproduced herein below:
“GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
FISHERY DEPARTMENT: DISPUR: GUWAHATI-6
OFFICE ORDER
No. eCF No. 557047/422
Dated Dispur the 10.07.2025
1. Whereas the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, vide order dated 21.05.2025 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 18318 of 2024 in the matter of M/s Teteliguri Navajyoti Matsyajibi S.S. Ltd. vs. State of Assam & Others, has upheld the judgment and order dated 28.05.2024 of the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court in W.A. No. 88/2023 concerning the settlement of 25/28/103/104 No.
Dhipujijan/Garanga/Garsag/Malia Group Fishery in Morigaon district.
2. And whereas the Hon'ble Supreme Court has, in its said judgment, specifically referred to and relied upon Government Circular No. FISH 19/65/2017-FISHERY/1 (eCF No. 50022) dated 18.01.2018, published in the Assam Gazette dated 04.04.2019, which laid down the procedure and required documents for tender-based settlement of Government fisheries.
3. And whereas based on the said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has categorically directed that henceforth, all Tender Inviting Authorities must incorporate a specific clause in the Notice Inviting Tenders (NITs) stating that the documents and procedures laid down in the aforesaid Government Circular dated 18.01.2018 shall be mandatorily followed so long as the said circular remains in force. A copy of the said circular is also to be enclosed with every NIT.
4. Now, therefore, in compliance with the above directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, all District Commissioners and Sub-Divisional Officers (Civil), being the Tender Inviting Authorities for settlement of 60% Government fisheries under Rule 3(a) and (b) of the ASSAM FISHERY RULES , 1953, are hereby directed to:
i. Strictly follow the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and incorporate the required clause in all future NITs for settlement of Government fisheries;
ii. Ensure that a copy of the Government Circular dated 18.01.2018 is annexed with the NIT
iii. Note that any omission or lapse in complying with the above shall render the NIT invalid and consequently, the bids received under such defective NITs shall also be treated as invalid in law.
5. It is further reiterated that the provisions of Government Order ECF No. E 496583/27 dated
Compliance with Supreme Court guidelines is essential for the validity of tender invitations in the tender process for government fisheries.
The court emphasized the authority's discretion in deciding whether to issue re-tender notices and the importance of protecting government revenue in settlement processes.
The court emphasized the importance of following proper procedure and complying with previous court directions in issuing public notices for settlement of government assets, and highlighted the need ....
It is settled position of law that power of judicial review of administrative action is intended to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality or unreasonableness or bias or mala fide.
The court emphasizes the necessity for transparency and fairness in administrative decision-making regarding public tenders, holding that a lack of proper publication in tender processes undermines c....
A party must participate in a tender process to maintain the right to challenge related settlements; acquiescence can bar claims where a party fails to act timely.
Point of Law : A certificate issued by such an authority carries with it a presumption under Section 114 III.(e) – “That judicial and official acts have been regularly performed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.