IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH), KOHIMA BENCH
SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J.
Shri. Y. Vungthungo, Senior Principal - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Nagaland And Ors - Respondents
WP(C) 50 of 2023
Decided on : 13-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's promotion process and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondents' contest and claims against petitioner (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 16) |
| 3. jurisdictional limitations of upa-lokayukta (Para 9 , 11 , 18) |
| 4. disposition of writ petition and interim order (Para 12 , 30 , 31 , 33) |
| 5. verification of educational credentials (Para 14 , 15 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J.
The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 28.01.2021 passed by the Upa-Lokayukta, Nagaland, Kohima in Case No. A.NLP-13/2020. The further prayers are for setting aside the proceedings in case No. A.NLP-13/2020 as well as order dated 28.01.2021 passed by the Upa-Lokayukta, Nagaland and the Notification dated 24.03.2023 issued by the Commissioner and Secretary, Government of Nagaland, Department of Education whereby the officiating Promotion of the writ petitioner from the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) to Principal vide the earlier notification dated 17.07.2014 stood revoked subject to final recommendation of the Nagaland Lokayukta, Directorate of Investigation, Nagaland.
2. The case projected by the petitioner is that he was appointed initially as a Computor under the Directorate of Economics & Statistics on 11.03.1997. Subsequently, he was sent on deputation as Post Graduate Teacher under the Department of School Education for a period of two years. While the petitioner was serving as a Post Graduate Teacher on deputation, he was regularized in his original post i.e. Computor in the Economics & Statistics Department. The petitioner, however, was not reverted back to his parent department but he was absorbed as a Post Graduate Teacher in the School Education Department. During his service under the School Education Department, the petitioner claimed to have pursued B.Ed Degree twice- one from CMJ University, Shillong, Meghalaya in the year 2011 and another from CSJM University, Kanpur in the year 2016. The petitioner however submitted his B.Ed Degree certificate which he had obtained from CSJM University, Kanpur. The petitioner was thereafter promoted on officiating basis to the post of Principal (Class-I Gazetted) of the Higher Secondary Schools under the Department of School Education, Nagaland by order dated 17.07.2014. By the said order, there are several other persons were promoted including the petitioner and the private respondents No. 5 to 9.
3. There was a process of verification of documents initiated by the Department of School Education by constituting a Special Screening Committee. During the process, the B.Ed Degree certificate submitted by the petitioner from CSJM University, Kanpur was found to be ‘not genuine’. The private respondents No. 5 to 9 lodged a complained before the Nagaland Lokayukta being Case No. A.NLP-13/2020. The Nagaland Lokayukta by order dated 28.01.2021 took cognizance on the complaint filed and directed the Investigating Officer to collect or seized from the School Education Department the letter of the petitioner forwarding his B.Ed Certificate to the School Education Department. Thereafter by order dated 20.08.2021, the Nagaland Upa-Lokayukta upon examination of the materials available passed an interim recommendation to the Department of School Education to review the officiating promotion Notification dated 17.07.2014 in respect of the petitioner. This recommendation was an interim recommendation. Final recommendation was to follow after verification of the B.Ed Degree obtained from CMJ University, Shillong. Pursuant to the interim recommendation issued by the Nagaland Upa- Lokayukta, the petitioner was served with a show cause Notice dated 08.02.2022 to which the petitioner submitted his written reply to the show cause notice. Thereafter by memo dated 20.05.2022, an enquiry was proposed against the petitioner by the Department of School Education. The petitioner also filed a written statement against the memo issued. Subsequently by Notification dated 24.03.2023 followi
AI
The Upa-Lokayukta has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of fraudulent qualifications affecting public service promotions, but such complaints are subject to statutory limitations as per the Nag....
The Lokayukta was barred from conducting a preliminary enquiry on the complaint of overstay in service under Section 9(1)(a) and Clause-(d) to the Second Schedule of the Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for active application of mind and proper consideration of the defense reply before making recommendations for instituting criminal....
The court upheld the Lokayukta's jurisdiction to investigate recruitment irregularities, clarifying that previous actions can impact public servants under statutory provisions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for adherence to the principles of natural justice before passing any adverse orders by the authorities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 9 of the Nagaland Lokayukta Act, 2017 and the applicability of the bar of investigation in the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.