IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MANISH CHOUDHURY
Pashupati Prasad Shukla, S/o Ganga Prasad Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. The instant criminal petition under Section 528 , Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [ BNSS ] is preferred by the petitioner seeking setting aside and/or quashing of an Order dated 08.08.2024 and other subsequent and consequential Orders passed thereafter by the Court of learned Special Judge, Cachar at Silchar [‘the Special Court’, for short] in NDPS Case no. 10/2008, whereby, the Special Court had issued Non-Bailable Warrants of Arrest [NBWAs] against the petitioner to secure his appearance in the proceedings of NDPS Case no. 10/2008 pending before it. The petitioner has also sought setting aside and/or quashing of another Order dated 28.10.2024 passed subsequently in the same proceedings. By the Order dated 28.10.2024, the petitioner has been declared as a proclaimed absconder.
2. A brief narration of the previous events leading to the passing of the Orders, more particularly, the impugned Orders, dated 08.08.2024 and dated 28.10.2024, appears necessary to appreciate the issues raised and involved in the lis.
3. At around 08-00 hours on 02.08.2008, the Officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence [DRI], Silchar proceeded to the Office
Inder Mohan Goswami and another vs. State of Uttaranchal and others
Raghuvansh Dewanchand Bhasin vs State of Maharashtra and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.