Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
PRANJAL DAS
Abdul Mazid @ Abdul Mojit Son Of Late Ayes Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam Represented By The Pp Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interlocutory application for bail after conviction (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on flaws in trial court judgment and bail considerations (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's evaluation of bail and sentence suspension (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. order granting bail and conditions imposed (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
PRANJAL DAS, J.
1. Heard Mr. S.K. Poddar and Mr. D. Ullah, learned counsels for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. P. Barthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The instant interlocutory application is preferred seeking suspension of execution of the sentence passed against the three applicant-appellant and for his release on bail.
3. The applicant as the appellant has preferred the accompanying appeal, Criminal Appeal no. 295/2025 against a Judgment dated 10.07.2025 and order on sentence dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Morigaon in Sessions Case no. 97/2017. By the Judgment dated10.07.2025, the applicant-appellant has been found guilty of the offence under Section 307 r/w Section 34 , IPC; Section 326 r/w Section 34 , IPC; and Section 34 1 r/w Section 34 , IPC. By the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
