Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SHAMIMA JAHAN
Jakir Hussain, S/o Habibur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Mizoram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAMIMA JAHAN, J.
Heard Mr. Jordan Rohmingthanga, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. C Zoramchhana, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 and Ms. Vanneihsiami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Mizoram, appearing for respondent No. 1.
2. This application has been filed under Section 528 read with Section 438 & 442 of the BNSS for modification of the Order dated 22.05.2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class-III, Aizawl Judicial District, Mizoram. By the said order, the learned Court while allowing the petitioner to go on bail had made it subject to certain conditions:-
(1) The petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 2 lakhs to be deposited in the Account Branch.
(2) The petitioner shall furnish two reliable sureties who are regular Government servants posted in the area lying within Aizawl Judicial District.
(3) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of this Court or re-locate from his present address which was given in the police record without the permission of this court.
(4) The petitioner shall not influence witnesses or cause directly or indirectly, the destruction or disappearance of any material as may b
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
