IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Musstt. Jahura Khatun, W/o Late Giyas Uddin – Respondent
MFA. No. 74 of 2021
Decided on : 15-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compensation awarded for death arising from employment. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. argument on liability due to learner's license details. (Para 10 , 12 , 16 , 18) |
| 3. defense that accident connected to employment. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. precedent on learner's license as valid. (Para 25 , 28) |
| 5. murder can be considered an accidental death. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. causation link between employment and death. (Para 34 , 36) |
| 7. court's final ruling and record return. (Para 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT :
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
1. Heard Ms. R.D. Mazumdar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Barman, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
2. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, has been filed by the appellant, i.e., National Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 30.12.2017, passed by the learned Commissioner, Employee’s Compensation, Nagaon, Assam in N.E.C. Case No.17/2016.
3. By the impugned judgment and award, the learned Commissioner for Employee’s Compensation, Nagaon had awarded a compensation amount of Rs. 6,70,160/- (Rupees Six Lakh Seventy Thousand and One Hundred Sixty only) to the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, on account of death of Giyas Uddin, during the course of an arising out of his employment. The appellant was directed to pay the said compensation amount within a period of 30(thirty) days from the date of receipt of the order, failing which it was directed to pay an interest @ 12% per annum on the awarded amount from the date of accident till the realization of the awarded amount.
4. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant appeal, in brief, is that the husband of the respondent No. 1, namely, Giyas Uddin, was the driver of the vehicle bearing Registration No. AS-02C-9455 (Tata Indica). Late Giyas Uddin, was employed by the respondent No.5, herein. On 06.04.2016, at about 7:30 PM, while he was driving the aforesaid vehicle from Sialmari to Nagaon town, he met with an accident with a motorcycle at Madhupur, Kadamtala Bazar. After the said accident, some person physically assaulted him badly, as a result of which, he sustained serious injuries. He was immediately transferred to B. P. Civil Hospital, Nagaon, where he succumbed to his injuries.
5. In this connection, a police case, i.e. Nagaon P. S. Case No.853/2016 was registered under 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860. On death of the Giyas Uddin, his widow, i.e. the respondent No. 1 of this appeal and his daughters, respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, had filed a claim petition before the Commissioner, Employee’s Compensation, Nagaon, Assam-cum- Assistant Labour Commissioner, Nagaon, under Section 22 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, for grant of compensation on account of death of Giyas Uddin, on 07.04.2016, during the course of his employment.
6. In the said claim petition, the employer of late Giyas Uddin, namely, Md. Akbar Hussain, (respondent No. 5 in this appeal) as well as the National Insurance Company Limited (the appellant and the insurer of the vehicle, bearing Registration No.AS-02C-9455 (Tata Indica) were named as the opposite party. The opposite party contested the claimed case by filing a written statement. Upon pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed by the Commissioner, Employee’s Compensation, Nagaon:-
i. Whether the deceased Giyas Uddin, was the employee in the vehicle bearing Registration No. AS- 02C-9455 (Tata Indica), under the employment of opposite party No. 1.
ii. Whether Giyas Uddin, died in the course of and arising out of his employment.
iii. Whether the claimants are entitled to any compensation, and if so, from whom.
7. In support of their contentions, the claimants examined the claimant No. 1, as PW-1, and exhibited 8(eight) documents, namely, Police Report as Exhibit-1, FIR as Exhibit-2, Postmortem Examination Report as Exhibit-3, Driving License as Exhibit-4, Salary Certificate as Exhibit-5, Insurance Pol
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.