Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT KOHIMA BENCH
SHAMIMA JAHAN
Moatemsu. A. Jamir S/o Shri. Aochuba – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
SHAMIMA JAHAN, J.
This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari to set aside the impugned order dated 19.12.2019 passed by the Upa Lokayukta, Nagaland, Kohima in R.C Case No. 2/2013 registered under Section 409/420/120 B IPC. The petitioner had also challenged the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 15.07.2020 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Dimapur, Nagaland in pursuance to the impugned order dated 19.12.2019.
It is the case of the petitioner that the Upa Lokayukta vide order dated 19.12.2019 had issued certain directions as well as recommendations in respect of two (2) enquiries conducted by him. The order dated 19.12.2019 makes it clear that the same were passed in respect of two (2) issues i.e., (1) In respect of rampant condemnation and dismantling of PWD quarters at Dimapur and (2) Irregular issue of Patta, regularization of land, extension and mutation of patta in PWD Colony, Dimapur. In respect of the first part, the Lokayukta after enquiries as well as upon consideration of various orders have issued directions as mentioned herein below:-
“Verify the buildings yet to be dismantled by the allotees o
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
