Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Hindustan Latex Family Planning Promotion Trust – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam Through Health And Family Welfare, Department, – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of the case and review application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenge based on eligibility and fraud allegations. (Para 4) |
| 3. allegations of fraud regarding eligibility certificates. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and documents related to the tender process. (Para 7 , 8 , 14 , 18) |
| 5. legal precedents cited regarding fraud in contractual agreements. (Para 12) |
| 6. submissions regarding legal standards for review actions. (Para 13 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. court's stance on the burden of proof and review considerations. (Para 19 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. principle regarding judicial review in contractual matters. (Para 21 , 34) |
| 9. responses of opposing parties and arguments against the review. (Para 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. discussion on judicial discretion and review limitations. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 38) |
| 11. final decision-making criteria applied by the court. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 12. rejection of review on grounds of lack of merit. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 13. dismissal of review with costs imposed. (Para 43 , 44 , 46 , 47) |
| 14. conclusion with imposed costs. (Para 45) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J.
The instant application has been filed for review of the judgmen
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
