SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1613

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, ANJAN MONI KALITA, JJ.
Azizur Rahman, S/o Late Abdur Rezzaque – Petitioner 
Versus
The State Of Assam And 3 Ors – Respondents 
WA 245 of 2025
Decided on : 17-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Sr. Adv., Ms. R. Choudhury, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. D.K. Sarmah, Advocate, Mr. S.P. Choudhury, Advocate, Mr. B. Sarma, Advocate

Temporary employment status at the time of absorption into a non-pensionable establishment does not qualify for pension benefits under the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969.

Headnote:(A) Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969 - Section 22(2)(ii) of the Assam Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Board Act, 1985 - Claim for pension after absorption into the Board - The appellant's previous service was temporary and officiating, thus ineligible for pension under the Rules as he did not hold a permanent position - Court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge who dismissed the appellant’s claim for pension benefits. (Paras 10, 14, 20)

(B) Temporary Employment - The status of employment at the time of absorption impacts eligibility for pension rights - Temporary officiating service does not confer pension eligibility upon absorption in a non-pensionable establishment. (Paras 17, 19)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was temporarily appointed as an Assistant Engineer in 1988, absorbed into the Assam Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Board, and claimed pension rights post-retirement. The contention was based on the treatment of service as substantive under Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969.

Findings of Court:
The appellant was found not entitled to pension as his previous employment was temporary and not made permanent; hence claims for pension under the 1969 Rules were denied.

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to pension rights upon absorption in the Board, given his temporary status at the time of absorption.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that since the appellant’s service was temporary, he could not claim pension rights under the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, validating that rights on absorption are contingent on prior employment status.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction of parties and representation. (Para 1)
2. factual background of appellant's appointment. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. details of appellant's service and absorption. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. contentions regarding pension entitlement. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's analysis of eligibility for pension. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. dismissal of appeal. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

M. Zothankhuma, J

1. Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel for the appellant assisted by Ms. R. Choudhury. Also heard Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3 and Mr. D.K. Sarmah, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel appears for the respondent No.4.

2. The appellant/writ petitioner has prayed for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 23.06.2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.4821/2023, by which his prayer to grant him pension under the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969 has been dismissed.

3. The appellant’s case is that consequent upon the withdrawal of the appointment of one Majibur Rahman Pradhani and on the recommendation of the Assam Public Service Commission, vide letter dated 07.07.1987, the Governor of Assam was pleased to appoint the appellant temporarily to officiate as Assistant Engineer (Civil) under the Directorate of Municipal Corporation, Assam, vide Notification dated 05.07.1988. The Notification dated 05.07.1988 also stated that the appointment of the appellant was purely temporary and might be terminated at any time, on 1(one) month’s notice on either side. It further stated that his services was liable to be transferred anywhere in the State of Assam including the hill areas. It may be stated here that the Municipal Administration Department (‘MAD’ in short) has now been renamed as the Department of Housing and Urban Affairs.

4. The appointment letter dated 05/07/1988, appointing the petitioner to temporarily officiate as A.E.(Civil) states as follows :-

“GOVERNMENT JE AGSAN

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPACINGNT

ORDERS BY THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

NOTIFICATION

Dt. Dispur, the 5ht July' 88.

No.MA 32/84/312 : The offer of appointment of Shri Majibur Rahman Pradhani as Assistant Engineer under the Directorate of Municipal Administration, Assam, vide notification No. MA 32/84/300 dt. 31.5.88 in hereby withdrawal as he has failed to join to the post within due time.

No 32/84/312 : Consequent upon the withdrawal of the appointment of Shri Majibur Rahman Pradhani and on recommendation of the Assam Public Service Commission vide their letter No. 42/P30/A-45/1/84-85 dtd.7.7.87, the Governor of Assam is pleased to appoint the following person temporarily to officiate as Asstt. Engineer (Civil) under the Directorate of Municipal Adan. Assam, Hengrabari Road, Guwahati-6 in the scale of pay of 875-50-1075-EB-40-1275-EB-45-1500-50-1850/-p.m. plus other allowances as admissible under the Rules with effect from the date of joining. The appointee is to report for duties to the Director of Municipal, Administration, Assam, Dispur, Guwahati-6 immediately before proceeding to his place of posting.

The, appointment is purely temporary and my be terminated at any time on one month's notice on oither side. Their services are liable to co transferred anywhere in the State of Assam including Hill Areas..

No TA. & DA inadmissible to (…sic…) on joining the post or on terminated of appointment.

He is liable to serve in any Defence Service or posts connected with the Defence of India for a period of not less than 4(four) years including the period spent on training, if any.

His inter se seniority will be fixed later on.

Hame and Address of the candidate Place of posting

1. Md. Azizur Rahman, Karimganj, Municipal

Vill. Jogir Mahal,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top