IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Rina Bora W/o Late Budhindra Nath Bora – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following relief:
“"In the premises aforesaid, it is most respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit this application, call for the records and issue a Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order of cancellation of allotment of land vide No. JDA/Corrs/19/2007/1292 dated 07.01.2014 issued by the Respondent No.3, Jorhat Development Authority (at Annexure 11 to this petition) and subsequent letter vide No. JDA/Corrs/19/2007/1366 dated 21.03.2014 issued by the Respondent No.3, Jorhat Development Authority (at Annexure- 14 to this petition) and why the Certificate of Allotment of land vide No. JDA/RLDS/8/93/97/10 dated 13.01.2016 issued by the Respondent No.3 (at Annexure- 17 to this petition) and why the Deed of Sale dated 17.02.2016 (at Annexure- 19 to this petition) and the Order granting permission for construction of boundary wall dated 12.02.2018 (at Annexure- 20 to this petition) shall not be set aside and quashed and why the petitioner shall not be allowed to register the plot of land measuring
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and Ors. Vs T. T. Murali Babu reported
A. Shanmugam Vs Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya Nandhavana Paripalanai Sangam reported
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.