Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ANJAN MONI KALITA
Kipa Kaha and Anr Son of Kipa Hanu – Appellant
Versus
State of AP represented by the PP of AP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. misuse of fake taekwondo certificates. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. mutual settlement sought by petitioners. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. case law distinctions considered. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's discretion on interference. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. dismissal of the criminal petition. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Heard Mr. M. Bagra, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Loyi, learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
2. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself.
3. The facts of the case are that on 25.06.2021, an FIR was lodged by one Shri Kipa Kaha (petitioner No.1 herein), President of Arunachal Taekwondo Association (ATA), alleging that some persons had misused fake Taekwondo certificates to avail government jobs under meritorious sports quota of the Government of India. It was alleged that the Government of India had notified 63 (sixty three) sports disciplines vide Reference No.F.No.14034/1/2013-ESTT dated 01.09.2020, before the Officer-in-Charge, Special Investigation Team (SIT), PHQ, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.
4. After receipt of the said FIR, a case has been r
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
