Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ANJAN MONI KALITA
Lukri Kambu, Son of Shri Jiluk Kambu – Appellant
Versus
State of AP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.
Heard Mr. D. Kamduk, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This instant case has been taken up for final disposal at the motion stage itself as this Court is of the opinion that no prejudice will be caused to the respondent No.2, who is the informant and the father of the victim, and the respondent No.3, who is the victim in the instant case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has also agreed that no prejudice will be caused, if the case is disposed of at the motion stage itself.
4. This application filed under Section 528 of the BNS S , 2023 for exercising/invoking the inherent power of this Court for quashing of criminal proceeding in connection with the POCSO Case No.01/2021 corresponding to Aalo W.P.S Case No.24/2024 under Section 64 BNS , R/w Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 (State vs. Lukri Kambu). The application has also been filed for quashing of the FIR dated 03.12.2024 in connection with Aalo W.P.S Case No.24/2024, under Section 64 BNS , R/w Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 which is pending before the Spec
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
