Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, KOHIMA BENCH
Devashis Baruah
Tsilevino Angami – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland Represented By The Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. Taka Masa, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Sentilong, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. E. Thiba Phom, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. It has been brought to the attention of this Court during the course of hearing that the Respondent Authorities are presently taking steps for going ahead with the interview for filling up of 124 posts of Nurses by way of regularization.
3. Mr. E. Thiba Phom, the learned Government Advocate who represents the State respondents had produced before this Court a para wise reply dated 29.08.2025 issued by the Under Secretary to the Government of Nagaland. The same is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”. Mr. E. Thiba Phom, the learned Government Advocate submitted on instructions that an early resolution of the instant dispute would be in the interest of the State. This Court enquired with the learned Government Advocate, as to whether, the State would like to file any affidavit. The learned Government Advocate on instructions submitted that the document kept on record and marked with the letter “X” be considered as the st
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
