Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KARDAK ETE
Ledo Tea Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by the Its Commerce Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
1. Heard Dr. B.P. Todi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Dr. A. Todi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents.
2. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the letter dated 09.07.2021, issued by the Deputy Director of Tea Development, Tea Board of India, whereby the claim of the petitioner for grant of subsidy/financial assistance for the financial year 2015-2016 under the Special Purpose Tea Fund Scheme (SPTF in short) and the Tea Development and Promotion Scheme of Tea Board of India, has been rejected on account of non-completion of uprooting of tea bushes within the financial year in which the application was submitted (i.e. 31.03.2016).
3. Briefly put, the petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered Office at Sir R.N.M. House, 3rd Flow, 3B, Lal Bazar Street, Kolkata and at Ledo in the District of Tinsukia, Assam. The petitioner is represented through its Director, Mr. Nirmit Lohia.
4. The Central Government introduced scheme for the Tea Board, namely-Tea Development and Promotion Scheme, for implementation during the X
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
