IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
Robin Phukan
Rofiqul Islam, S/o Late Jonab Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam, Represented by the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Robin Phukan, J.
Heard Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam, appearing for the respondent No.1, Mr. K. Gogoi, learned standing counsel for the respondents No. 2 and 4 in Higher Education Department and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned standing counsel for the respondent No.3 in Finance Department.
2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Rofiqul Islam, has challenged the resolution no. 1 (ka) and 1 (Kha) dated 17.11.2011, adopted by the Governing Body, Habraghat Mahavidiyalaya, (Annexure-15) Communicated to the petitioner vide letter No. HMV/GB/79/25/313, dated 17.05.2013 and the order/letter, No. G(B)AC/PERMISSION/247/2015/368, dated 04.12.2015 (Annexure-16), by which the Principal, Habraghat Mahavidyalaya, Krishnai was permitted to advertise the vacant post of Assistant Professor in English Department and also the impugned Advertisement, dated 10.01.2016, (Annexure-17) issued by the respondent No.2 and the order dated 18.07.2022 vide Memo No. DHE/CE/CC/01/2022/Pt./164A (Annexure-32) issued by the respondent No.2 and to issue direction to the respo
Controller of Court of Ward, Kolhapur & Anr. V. G.N. Gharpade
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.