Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ, ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
M.S. Abigail Hmingthanpari D/o V.L. Tinbiaka – Appellant
Versus
Gauhati High Court, Rep. by the Registrar General – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ.
1. We have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. R.M. Deka, learned Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. T.J. Mahanta, learned Senior Advocate/Standing Counsel, Gauhati High Court assisted by Mr. P.P. Dutta, learned Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned Additional Advocate General, Mizoram for respondent No.4.
2. The writ petitioner has challenged the notification dated 09.04.2025 issued by the Secretary to Government of Mizoram, cancelling her appointment to the post of Grade-I Judicial Officer of Mizoram Judicial Service on the ground that before her appointment in Grade I, she had cleared the examination and had been appointed as a Grade-III Judicial Officer, which prevented her from being considered for the post of Grade-I Judicial Officer.
3. During the pendency of the writ petition, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rejanish K.V. vs. K. Deepa & Ors. 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2196 held as follows:
“171. In view of the answer which we propose to give for Question No.4, it may not be necessary to deal with the other questions, however, since the questions are framed by this Court, we propose to answer all t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
