SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1862

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KARDAK ETE, J.
Ferjina Parbin Jalil D/o Late Jaliluddin Ahmed - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No. 3347 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B D Konwar Sr. Adv., Mr. K Kalita,Mr. B Borah,A. ADO,Mr K Kashyab,Mr. I H Saikia,Mr. R Kalita,Mr H Agarwal,Mr J Singh,Mr. R Saloi,Mrs J M Konwar Advocate
For the Respondent: GA, Assam, SC, AG (A And E)

Unmarried dependent daughters are entitled to family pension beyond 21 years as per amended Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969.

Headnote:(A) Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969 - Amended Rule 143 - Family pension entitlement - Family pension for unmarried dependent daughters allowed beyond age of 21 years per amended Rule 143 - Petitioner discontinued pension at 21 under old rules, entitled to resume per new provisions - Right to pension from amendment date recognized. (Paras 5, 13, 14)

(B) Writ jurisdiction - Authority of court to direct respondent authorities to comply with statutory provisions - Timely provision mandated for entitlement recognition. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an unmarried dependent daughter of a deceased government servant, was granted family pension until 21 years under old rules, and the amendment allows continuation beyond this age. The pension was discontinued upon reaching 21.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is entitled to family pension from the date of the amendment notification (09.08.2018) despite previous discontinuation of payments.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to continue receiving family pension after age 21 based on the amended rule and prior conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the application of the amended rule allowing unmarried dependent daughters to receive family pension beyond 21 years, empowering the petitioner to draw benefits from the amendment date, overriding past limitations.

Result: Writ petition allowed and directed for entitlement restoration.

Table of Content
1. family pension entitlement for unmarried daughters. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments on pension entitlement post-amendment. (Para 6 , 7)
3. court's reasoning on pension eligibility. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. key amendment details for rule 143. (Para 10)
5. court's final order on pension approval. (Para 15 , 16)

Judgment & Order :

KARDAK ETE, J.

Heard Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. S. K. Medhi, learned Standing Counsel, AG for the respondent No. 2.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to provide family pension in favour of the petitioner, in terms of the amended Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, as amended in 2018.

3. The petitioner claims to be an unmarried dependent daughter of late Jalil Uddin Ahmed, who had retired from service as Forest Ranger in the Sivasagar Forest Division on 30.09.2011 and died on 05.02.2015. The petitioner’s mother predeceased her father on 07.04.2005. The family pension was provided to the petitioner under the then-existing Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, which provided entitlement of family pension to an “unmarried minor daughter,” and the petitioner received such pension until 14.09.2016.

4. It is the contention of the petitioner that the family pension was granted to her until she attained the age of 21 years. Thereafter, in view of the provisions of then-existing Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, the pension was discontinued.

5. The State of Assam has amended Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, vide notification dated 09.08.2018, wherein it provides that an unmarried dependent daughter would be entitled to draw family pension beyond 21 years of age. Note No. 4 appended to Rule 143 specifies that the benefits of the amended provision are to be allowed to those who were already drawing family pension as on the date of publication of the amended notification. However, the said amended Rule is silent on the situation where family pension, which was being drawn by a minor unmarried daughter until the attainment of 21 years of age, is to be continued thereafter for such unmarried dependent daughters.

6. Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that since the petitioner was drawing family pension under the then-existing Rule 143 as an unmarried minor daughte in respect of her late father, she is entitled to continue to draw family pension in terms of the newly amended Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969. He further submits that the petitioner’s pension had been discontinued upon attaining the age of 21 years under the old Rules, but with the subsequent amendment allowing unmarried dependent daughters to receive pension beyond 21 years, the petitioner is now entitled to continue to draw the family pension. Accordingly, it is submitted that the respondent authorities may be directed to provide family pension to the petitioner.

7. Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No. 1 submits that as per Note 4 under the Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, the cases where family pension is already being drawn on the date of publication of the notification i.e. 09.08.2018, same shall be allowed to continue by the current recipient till his/her eligibility ceases as per normal rules and thereafter, the family pension shall be paid as per procedure as indicated at Note 2 of the amended Rule 143 (ii)(c). He submits that the respondent authority has already allowed lifetime family pension to unmarried dependent daughters of deceased Government servants beyond the age of 21 years, by amending Rule 143 of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, which is currently in vogue.

8. He submits that the applicability of family pension under Note 3 of amended Rule 143(ii)(c) provides t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top