THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY
Royal Coal Products – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Invoking extra-ordinary and discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have instituted the present writ petition seeking inter-alia a direction to declare that the demolition exercise carried in the business premises of the petitioner no. 1 firm was illegal and unauthorized. The petitioners have also sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to pay adequate compensation to the petitioners to the extent of Rupees Two Crores for the alleged arbitrary and unauthorized action of the respondent authorities towards demolition of the petitioner no. 1 firm’s business premises. A direction has also been sought for to register a case against the respondents, named as accused, in a First Information Report [FIR] lodged by the petitioner no. 2 before the respondent no. 7.
2. The petitioners have stated that the petitioner no. 1 is a proprietorship concern [‘the petitioner firm’] and it had installed a coke manufacturing unit in a plot of land and the petitioner no. 2 is the sole proprietor of the petitioner firm. The petitioners have claimed that in the coke manufacturing unit, it used to produce co
Whirpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai and others
Bishan Das and others, vs. State of Punjab and others
State of West Bengal and others vs. Vishnunarayan & Associates [P] Ltd. and another
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. vs. Madanlal Agrawal
North Eastern Coalfields Coal India Limited vs. Mubarak Ali and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.