SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1893

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ., ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY, J.
Dr. Satyajit Paul, Son of Late Prasanta Kumar Paul – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Education (Technical) Department and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Appeal No.191 of 2025, Writ Appeal No.184 of 2025, Writ Appeal No.193 of 2025
Decided On : 18-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. R.M. Deka, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. K. Gogoi and Mr. S. Das, Standing Counsel, Education (Higher) Department, Mr. R.K. Talukdar, Standing Counsel, Accountant General.

Promotions must adhere to financial approvals and cannot take effect post-retirement; rights to be considered for promotion do not guarantee actual promotion.

Headnote:(A) Assam Rules of Executive Business, 1968 - Promotion under Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) - Age of superannuation raised from 60 to 65 years by government - Promotion of lecturer to professor, effectuated post-retirement, deemed invalid as it lacked financial sanction from the Finance Department. (Paras 24-31)

(B) Validity of Executive Orders - Promotion recommendations and their implementations must comply with financial approvals; failure to do so renders such promotions non-effective post-retirement. (Paras 24-30)

(C) Right to Promotion - While the right to be considered for promotion is established, no absolute right to actual promotion exists, particularly if not served in the promotional capacity. (Paras 26-28)

Facts of the case:
Appellant appointed as lecturer via APSC, promoted retrospectively to Associate Professor, challenged superannuation order, and sought financial remuneration post-retirement notification. Respondents issued contradictory memorandums regarding training completion deadlines necessary for promotion.

Findings of Court:
Appellant entitled only to financial benefits from promotion period till age of superannuation, not beyond.

Issues: Validity of promotion post-retirement, requirement of financial sanction for executive orders, interpretation of Assam Rules of Executive Business.

Ratio Decidendi: Executive orders must have requisite financial approvals, and promotions cannot be valid if effective post-superannuation; only financial benefits from promotions are justifiable if already employed in the promoted position.

Result: Appeals allowed in part, with specified financial entitlement.

Table of Content
1. promotion eligibility and retirement details (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
2. procedural irregularities regarding approvals (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 30)
3. limitations on promotion post-retirement (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 31 , 32 , 33)
4. legal precedents on promotion rights (Para 28 , 29)
5. final order on financial entitlements (Para 35 , 36 , 37)

JUDGMENT :

Ashutosh Kumar, CJ.

All the 3(three) writ appeals have been taken up together and are being disposed off by this common judgment.

2. We have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. R.M. Deka, learned Advocate for the appellants; Mr. K. Gogoi and Mr. S. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Education (Higher) Department and Mr. R.K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General for the official respondents.

3. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 10.04.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No.2789/2024; WP(C) No.5804/2022 and WP(C) No.295/2023.

4. It would only be appropriate to first refer to the facts of the case before adverting to the impugned judgment.

5. The appellant, pursuant to a valid selection process conducted by the Assam Public Service Commission (APSC), was appointed as a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Department in Gauhati University. Thereafter, he acquired higher degrees and rose to the rank of Associate Professor under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) with effect from 01.01.2006.

After the establishment of the Golaghat Engineering College in the year 2018, considering the past record of the appellant, he was appointed as In-charge Principal of the said Engineering College till the selection of a regular Principal of the College.

6. The Government of Assam in the Higher Education (Technical) Department, vide Office Memorandum dated 29.07.2021, raised the age of superannuation of the incumbents serving in Professor Grade, promoted through CAS of the Government Engineering Colleges of Assam, from 60 to 65 years.

In the meantime, another development took place.

The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), vide a Public Notice dated 09.08.2021, extended the date for completing Orientation/Refresher Courses/Short Term Training Programmes/ Continuing Education Programmes, for promotion under CAS for Faculty Members/Librarians/PTIs in Degree/Diploma level Institutions up to 31.12.2018 for all the candidates to ensure uniformity. All the AICTE approved Institutions were requested to comply with the above provision of extension of time for the purposes of promotion.

7. Thereafter, the scrutiny process began for promoting the Assistant Professors to the Grade of Professor. The Head of Department of Mechanical Engineering Department, Jorhat Engineering College submitted a scrutiny report regarding the appellant, confirming that he had completed the mandatory Short-Term Training programmes of 1(one) week and 2(two) weeks duration on 17.05.2018 in accordance with the AICTE Notification and, therefore, he became eligible for promotion to the post of Professor under the CAS on or after 18.03.2018.

8. Based on the said scrutiny report, the Director, Technical Education, Assam submitted a proposal on 16.03.2022 before the Government of Assam in the Department of Education for adoption of AICTE Public Notice regarding extension of date for completing such courses up to 31.12.2018 for the purposes of promotion of Faculty Members of Engineering Colleges under the CAS.

9. The Government of Assam in the Education Department adopted the recommendations of the AICTE regarding extension of the date for completing the Short-Term Training Programme for promotion of Faculty Members of Engineering Colleges under the CAS up to 31.12.2018 vide Office Memorandum dated 28.03.2022.

This had prepared the stage for promotion of the appellant to the post of Professor, who was set to retire at the age of 60 years on 31.03.2022.

10. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC), however,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top