Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, CJ., ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Jan Saikia, Son of Sri Mohiram Saikia – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
(Ashutosh Kumar, C.J.)
We have heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. L. Gogoi, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development Department for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. The services of the appellant was terminated vide order dated 28.03.2023, which termination order was questioned by him before a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) 4632/2023, who refused to interfere with the decision of the respondents. Hence, this appeal.
3. The appellant was appointed as a Computer Assistant on contractual basis on 27.02.2009 but continued in the service till the time his service was dispensed with in the year 2023. While the appellant was working at Naharbari Gaon Panchayat in the district of Dhemaji, an FIR was lodged with the CID police station with respect to leakage of question paper of HSLC examination in General Science subject.
During the course of investigation of the afore-noted case, namely, CID PS Case No.3/2023, which was registered under Sections 120 B/420/427/409 IPC read with Section 66 B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the name of the appellant surfaced. He wa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
