THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Abdul Kayum Barbhuiya, S/o. Sahab Uddin Barbhuiya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, To Be Represented By The Public Prosecutor, Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA, J.
1. Heard Mr. A.M Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. K.A. Mazumder, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Also heard Ms. S. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. This appeal under Section 101(5) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is preferred against the judgment and order dated 06.07.2022, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hailakandi in Sessions (Child) Case No. 83/2019, convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo 7 (seven) years stay in a Corrective Home under Sections 364(A)/302/201/34 IPC.
3. It is submitted that the only relief sought for by the appellant, at this stage, is that the period of detention undergone by the appellant prior to the passing of the impugned judgment and sentence should be set off as no such order is available in the impugned judgment.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that the place of safety where the appellant had stayed prior to the passing of the judgment is not the same as the observation home/correction home where he has been placed after the passing of the judgment.
5. It may
A child’s detention in a place of safety counts towards their total sentence, allowing for set off under the relevant sections of the Juvenile Justice Act and CrPC.
Juveniles in conflict with the law should not be routinely detained in Observation Homes pending probation reports, emphasizing parental custody as an alternative.
Bail for juveniles under the JJ Act is the norm, with denial being an exception, requiring the prosecution to prove reasonable grounds for such denial.
Bail should generally be granted to juveniles, with serious offenses not excluding this unless specific safety or justice concerns arise. Emphasis on rehabilitation within the juvenile justice system....
Juvenile offenders must be remanded to special homes as per statutory provisions; sentences may be adjusted to time served if they reach adulthood during the proceedings.
Detention – Child Welfare Committee - Once corpus is minor and the girl had refused to go with her parents, then in such situation arrangement has to be made. Her interest is paramount and before pro....
The detention of a juvenile in an adult jail after being declared a juvenile contravenes the Juvenile Justice Act and constitutes a violation of constitutional rights, necessitating immediate correct....
The Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, consciously omitted to provide anticipatory bail for juveniles, considering the absence of the concept of 'custody' and the rehabilitatory, reformatory, and beneficial....
Bail for juveniles under the Juvenile Justice Act is mandatory unless there are justifiable grounds for denial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.