SANJAY YADAV, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, SIDDHARTHA VARMA
Rachna – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
1. Heard Sri. Saghir Ahmad, learned Senior Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Sri. Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Sri. Amit Sinha and Sri. J.K. Upadhyay, learned Additional Government Advocates for the State of U.P.
2. This writ petition has been listed before us in view of reference made by a Division Bench of this Court, considering the various provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015 [J.J. Act] and the law laid down by various Courts. While referring the case to Hon'ble the Chief Justice to constitute a larger Bench, the Division Bench framed following issues to be decided by the larger Bench:-
(2) Whether detention of a corpus in Women Protection Home/Nari Niketan/Juvenile Home/Child Care Home pursuant to an order (may be improper) can be termed/viewed as an illegal detention?
(3) Under the Scheme of the Juvenile Justice (Ca
Smt. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Another
State of Maharashtra and Others vs. Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee
Serious Fraud Investigation Office vs. Rahul Modi and Another
Smt. Raj Kumari vs. Superintendent, Women Protection, Meerut
Saurabh Kumar vs. Jailor, Koneila Jail
Manubhai Ratilal Patel vs. State of Gujarat
Kanu Sanyal vs. District Magistrate, Darjeeling and Others
Jaya Mala vs. Home Secretary, Government of Jammu and Kashmir
Janardan Reddy and Others vs. State of Hyderabad and Others
Irfan Khan vs. State of M.P. and Others
Independent Thought vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.