Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Kardak Ete
Rupa Devi, Daughter Of Late Rama Kanta Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam And Represented By The Secretary To Govt. Of Assam, Health And Family Welfare Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to slc decision on appointment (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. history of petitioner’s application and rejections (Para 5 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. petitioner’s arguments supporting entitlement (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. respondent's defense against claims (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court’s reasoning on delay affecting claims (Para 10 , 12 , 16) |
| 6. legal principles from supreme court on compassionate employment (Para 13 , 14 , 17) |
| 7. final disposition of the writ petition (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
Kardak Ete, J.
Heard Mr. U. B. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Health and Family Welfare Department and Mr. T. C. Chutia, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
2. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the Minutes of the Meeting of the State Level Committee (SLC) dated 27.11.2015, whereby, the proposal of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground has been rejected on the grounds of non-availability of vacancies and the lapse of two years from the date of application. The petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider him for appointment against any available vaca
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief, and claims made after significant delays cannot be entertained as the necessary urgency is lost.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial crises, and undue delays can render claims stale and unentitled.
Compassionate appointments must be sought without undue delay, as prolonged delays can negate the urgency and purpose of such provisions.
Compassionate appointments must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; undue delay can render applications stale and ineligible.
Compassionate appointments are not rights and must be addressed immediately; delays can render claims void due to the absence of financial crisis.
Compassionate appointment is a remedy to mitigate financial hardships due to a breadwinner's death, requiring timely application and consideration of changing financial circumstances. Delay can rende....
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly to address financial distress; significant delays render claims stale and ineligible for consideration.
Compassionate appointment claims must be made promptly; significant delay renders them stale as such claims are not vested rights meant to address immediate financial distress.
Compassionate appointment claims are contingent on urgency; significant delays may render applications stale and unjustified, nullifying the relief sought.
Compassionate appointment claims must be considered promptly; significant delays can negate the urgency required, making applications stale.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
