SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Kardak Ete, J.
Kamal Ch Das S/O Sri Maheswar Das, And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Education (Elementary) Department And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 5641 of 2020, WP(C) 5627 of 2020
Decided On : 02-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms L Hmar, Mr. M R Choudhury, Mr. K Kalita, Mr. I H Saikia
For the Respondent: GA, Assam, SC

The court ruled that petitioners, selected as teachers under the Operation Blackboard scheme, must be reinstated due to the invalidation of cancellation orders without substantial proof of misconduct.

Headnote:(A) Writ of Certiorari - Reinstatement of teachers - Assam Government rules and Operation Blackboard scheme - The petitioners' claims for reinstatement were rejected based on previous cancellation of appointments due to alleged excess recruitment. The Court noted that the petitioners were legitimately appointed after a selection process and had a right to be considered for their positions without obstacles based on unproven allegations. The court emphasized the government’s delays and failures in adhering to prior orders to identify genuine appointees. The impugned orders were quashed, and the petitioners were ordered to be reinstated as they fulfilled all selection criteria. (Paras 18, 36, 41, 44)

(B) Educational appointments - Requirements for fairness and transparency - The court stated that no valid reason was found to deny the petitioners’ appointments based on claims of excess appointments, which had not been substantiated through necessary inquiries. (Paras 40, 41)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, appointed as teachers under the Operation Blackboard scheme after an official selection process, faced cancellation of their appointments in 2001 due to allegations of excess hiring. Numerous legal proceedings ensued.

Findings of Court:
The petitioners were found to be genuine appointees under government scheme and entitled to reinstatement.

Issues: The key question pertained to whether legitimate appointments could be substantiated and whether the delay by authorities in rectifying their positions was unjustified.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the authorities failed to justify the cancellation of petitioners’ appointments and neglected their duties in addressing ongoing litigations. The regulations for fair treatment of selected candidates were reiterated emphatically.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of case history and factual context. (Para 2 , 4 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments for reinstatement of genuine appointees. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
3. respondents' counterarguments on appointment legitimacy. (Para 23 , 24)
4. court's observations on procedural fairness and decision validity. (Para 26 , 41 , 42)
5. final order directing reinstatement of petitioners. (Para 43 , 44)

JUDGMENT :

Kardak Ete, J.

Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N. J. Khataniar, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education, Assam for the respondents.

2. By filing these present writ petitions, the petitioners have assailed the Minutes of the Committee, dated 16.05.2020 and order dated 10.06.2020, issued by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Elementary Education Department, whereby the claim of the petitioners has been rejected with regard to reinstatement in service as teachers of LP and ME schools in the District of Nalbari. The petitioners also challenges the orders dated 16.07.2001, passed by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam; order dated 17.07.2001, passed by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Nalbari; order dated 19.07.2001, passed by the Director of Elementary Education; order dated 21.07.2001 passed by the District Elementary Education Officer, Nalbari; letter dated 24.01.2017 of the Government, by which the appointments of petitioners have been cancelled. The petitioners have also prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to reinstate them in service with effect from the date of their termination and to allow them to resume duties in their respective schools and to release their arrear salaries from the date of their initial joining in service until their reinstatement, along with admissible interest.

3. Having considered that issues involved in these writ petitions are similar on facts and law, the same were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common judgment and order.

4. As has been noted in the earlier proceedings, these cases have its, yet another, long drawn litigations and chequered history as the matter involved multiple litigations and gave rise to several Court cases regarding the appointment of OBB teachers in Nalbari District, Assam.

5. The petitioners in W.P.(C) No. 5627/2020 were appointed as L.P. School teachers against 288 sanctioned posts and the petitioners in W.P.(C) 5641/2020 were appointed as M.E. School teachers against 140 sanctioned posts in Nalbari District, alongwith Patacharkuchi Block of Barpeta district, under the Operation Black Board (OBB) scheme in the State of Assam.

6. Briefly put, an advertisement dated 28.12.1996 was published inviting applications for filling up the posts of Assistant Teachers in L.P., M.E., M.V., M.E.M., Jr. and Sr. Basic Schools. Being eligible, the petitioners applied for the posts and appeared in the interviews held on January 1997. Subsequently, a ban was imposed upon any appointment in the State of Assam. In the meantime, the Government of India launched the OBB scheme and sanctioned the creation of 7066 posts for L.P. and Middle School teachers in Assam vide order dated 08.03.2001. From the newly created posts under the OBB scheme, 288 posts were allotted for L.P. Schools and 140 posts were allotted for M.E. Schools in Nalbari District and Patacharkuchi Block under Barpeta District.

7. On 08.03.2001, the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Education Department, issued a W.T. message to all District Elementary Education Officers and Deputy Inspectors of Schools, lifting the ban on appointments under the Operation Blackboard (OBB) scheme and directing that no new applications be called and that candidates who had already applied would be called for interview. On 09.03.2001, the Sub-Divisional Level Advisory Board, on the basis of the earlier interviews, prepared and approved select lists for appointment and the names of the petitioners appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top