JUDGMENT :

KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.

Heard Mr. B. Kaushik, learned standing counsel for the Elementary Education Department, representing the two review petitioners. Also heard Mr. I.H. Saikia, learned counsel for all the 25 respondents.

2. The respondents herein are the writ petitioners in W.P.(C) 5032/2007, by which the respondents had prayed, amongst others, for a direction upon the authorities for payment of salary for the period the respondents had rendered their service. By judgment and order dated 16.06.2016, this Court had allowed the writ petition by directing as follows:-

“16. … In view thereof, this writ petition stands to be allowed with direction to the State respondents to make payment of the arrear salary to the petitioners with effect from February, 1997 as well as to continue making payment of the current salary. In so far as the arrear salary is concerned, the same shall be paid and disbursed within a period of 6 (six) months from today and while doing so, the State respondents are also allowed to carry out a verification process to ascertain the period from which the petitioners have been discharging services as Teachers uninterruptedly until this date.

17. In view of the