SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Devashis Baruah, J.
 
M/S Cadila Prarmaceuticals Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Commissioner And Secy. To The Govt. Of Assam, Health And Family Welfare, Deptt., And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 4231 of 2025
Decided On : 02-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Sr. Advocate, Mr. M. Sahewalla, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. B. Gogoi, Addl. A.G.

A Firm Debarment Notice is invalid if issued by an unauthorized party and violates the principles of natural justice by considering factors not stated in the initial notices.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Firm Debarment Notice - The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, challenged a Firm Debarment Notice for non-supply of essential drugs issued on 11.03.2025, citing lack of authority of the responder and violation of natural justice principles. (Paras 2, 10, 24, 25)

(B) Authority to Issue Notice - The court held that the notice was invalid as it was issued by an unauthorized individual contrary to the stipulated contractual terms. (Paras 20, 25)

(C) Natural Justice Principle - The debarring notice was deemed non-compliant with natural justice as it considered additional items not referenced in the initial show cause notice. (Paras 24, 25)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner participated in a tender for supplying essential drugs, received a Letter of Intent but faced difficulties leading to delayed supplies, prompting a show cause notice for debarment.

Findings of Court:
The Firm Debarment Notice was invalid due to lack of authority and non-compliance with natural justice.

Issues: The court addressed the authority of the issuer of the notice and adherence to natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: The respondent lacked the authority to issue the Firm Debarment Notice; thus, it was set aside.

Result: The Firm Debarment Notice dated 11.03.2025 is quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Devashis Baruah, J.

Heard Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Sahewalla, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Additional Advocate General who is also the Standing Counsel of the Health Department appears on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein by way of the present writ petition has assailed the Firm Debarment Notice bearing e-File No. 556245/11872 dated 11.03.2025.

3. The facts of the present case are that the petitioner is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying of various products ranging from active pharmaceutical intermediate, finished formulations, food supplements, biotechnology products, pharmaceutical machinery, etc.

4. A tender bearing No. 345545/2838 dated 01.08.2023 and a Corrigendum No. 1 bearing No. E-345545/2266 dated 18.08.2023 was issued by the Managing Director of the Assam Medical Services Corporation Limited i.e. the respondent No. 3 for supply of essential drugs. The petitioner participated in the said tender process. In pursuance to that, a Letter of Intent was issued bearing ECF No. 34556 dated 31.10.2023 thereby empanelling the petitioner for supply of essential drugs for a period of 3 (three) years with an option of extension for a further period of 1 (one) year.

5. A perusal of the said Letter of Intent dated 31.10.2023 reveals that it contains various terms and conditions. It is mentioned at Clause E of the said Letter of Intent that a successful bidder shall execute an agreement on non-judicial stamp paper of the value of Rs. 100/- within 10 (ten) working days from the date of intimation from the Tender Inviting Authority informing that his tender has been accepted. The specimen form of the agreement is at Annexure-XIII of the bid document.

6. Clause L of the Letter of Intent dated 31.10.2023 refers to the Penalty for Delayed Service Delivery. The said Clause being relevant is reproduced herein under:

L. Penalty for Delayed Service Delivery:

In case there is delay in delivery beyond the stipulated period as mentioned in the purchase order, there shall be penal deduction @ 2.0% of the value of delayed goods per week of delay or part thereof subject to a maximum of 10% of the total order value. Once the maximum price reduction is reached, termination of the Purchase Order will be considered.

In case alternate purchase is made, the incremental/ additional cost, if any incurred for such purchase shall be recovered from the defaulter.”

7. Clause M of the Letter of Intent dated 31.10.2023 is of relevance for the purpose of the instant proceedings inasmuch as the said Clause relates to Debarment/Blacklisting for failure in execution of supply/non-supply/default in supply. The said Clause M being relevant is reproduced herein under:

M. Debarment/Blacklisting for failure in execution of supply/non-supply/default in supply:

1. Product debarment: In case of non-supply or incomplete supply (i.e. less than 90% of the total ordered quantity) by the approved manufacturer / importer (Firm) within agreed delivery period including the delay penalty period or any such extended delivery period then the empanelment for that particular product shall be cancelled and the manufacturer/importer (Firm) shall be debarred for participating in any bid called by the Authority for a period of 5 years from the date of debarment for that item. In case the manufacturer/importer (Firm) supply 90% or more of the ordered quantity but fails to supply the entire quantity within the allowed delivery period then the firm shall be levied a penalty @ 10% of the value of the short-supplied item and same shall be adjusted against the payment for supply.

2. Firm Debarment: The firm shall be blacklisted and debarred from participating in any tender by the TIA or procuring agency for 3 (three) years if the company is debarred for all the items (where it has empanelm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top