SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 508

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
M/s Protech Telelinks - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam - Respondent
Writ Petition [Civil] no. 7345 of 2025
Decided On : 12-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Senior Advocate Mr. M. Sahewalla, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. D.P. Bora, Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department

Firm debarment from public contracts requires prior actionable product debarment, ensuring compliance with procedural norms.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Firm Debarment Notice issued for failure to supply essential drugs - Notice deemed invalid due to lack of preceding Product Debarment action per Clause 5H of Bidding Document - Non-supply by petitioner company did not warrant Firm Debarment without Product Debarment for at least three essential drugs - Judicial discipline mandates adherence to prior rulings. (Paras 23, 29, 31)

(B) Procurement Law - Public Interest - Actions taken against supplier must be consistent with procedural norms and past judgments to ensure fairness and avoid arbitrary debarment. (Paras 26, 34)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner company debarred from participating in tenders for three years due to non-supply of drugs below required percentage. The actions were based on multiple notices regarding failed deliveries, leading to a Firm Debarment Notice. The petitioner contended it had supplied over the minimum percentage of required drugs.

Findings of Court:
The issuance of the Firm Debarment Notice was arbitrary as it lacked prior Product Debarment actions required under the contract terms, thus the notice was quashed and deemed invalid.

Issues: The primary issue concerned whether the requirement for Firm Debarment necessitated prior Product Debarment and adherence to correct procedures in issuing notices.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that Firm Debarment cannot occur without first undergoing Product Debarment actions as outlined in the procurement guidelines, emphasizing the importance of consistency with judicial precedents in such determinations.

Result: Writ petition allowed, Firm Debarment Notice quashed and set aside.

Table of Content
1. challenge to firm debarment notice issued for supply deficiencies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's status as a qualified pharmaceutical supplier. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. notice of default and timeline for supply delivery issues. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. cumulative delivery status reflects debarment proceedings. (Para 14 , 21)
5. arguments on procurement process and compliance. (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
6. need for adherence to set procedures for debarment. (Para 27 , 29 , 30)
7. court's ruling on quashing firm debarment notice. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assail is made to a Firm Debarment Notice bearing e-File no. : 509791/20138 dated 15.11.2025 [Annexure-XXIII] issued under the hand of the Managing Director, Assam Medical Services Corporation Limited [AMSCL], that is, the respondent no. 3. The Firm Debarment Notice has been issued on the ground of non-supply of thirteen nos. of drugs and seventeen nos. of Purchase Orders [POs] where supplies were found below 90%. By the Firm Debarment Notice, the petitioner has been blacklisted and debarred from participating in any tender for a period of 3 [three] years from the date of issuance of the impugned Final Debarment Notice in terms of Clause no. 5, Sub-Clause – H, Pt. no. [ii] & Pt. no. [iii] and Sub-Clause – M for default in supply of thirteen nos. of essential drugs against seventeen nos. of Purchase Orders [POs] as per details mentioned in Annexure-A to the Firm Debarment Notice.

2. In order to understand the nature of challenge, the events leading to the issuance of the Firm Debarment Notice would require an exposition : By a Notice Inviting Tender [Framework Agreement] dated 09.02.2023, the AMSCL invited online tenders for empanelment of manufacturers for supply of essential drugs to various health facilities under the Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of Assam by entering into a Framework Agreement valid for three years.

3. As per the Notice Inviting Tender [NIT] and the Bidding Document, the primary objective of the AMSCL is to act as the central procurement agency for procurement of essential drugs, surgical, consumables & equipment, etc. on behalf of all the directorates / body / agency / mission under the Health & Family Welfare Department and the Medical Education & Research Department of the Government of Assam. By the NIT, the AMSCL had intended to establish a Framework Agreement with manufacturers and the process of empanelment would be valid for a period of three years with option to further extend the period for another one year.

4. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office at Yamuna Nagar, Haryana and its factory at Mauza Ogli, District – Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh. The petitioner company [hereinafter also referred to as ‘the petitioner’, at places, for easy reference] is a pharmaceutical manufacturer and supplier. It has claimed work experience in the field of supplying medicines and essential drugs to different Government and non-Government agencies across the country.

5. Finding itself eligible to submit bid as per the terms and conditions of the NIT dated 09.02.2023, the petitioner submitted its bid. Upon bid evaluation, the bid of the petitioner was adjudged as a valid bid. On 28.07.2023, the office of the respondent no. 3 issued a Letter of Intent [LoI] to 185 nos. of bidders informing them that they had been empaneled, after the process of e-tendering, for entering into a Framework Agreement each with the AMSCL for three years for supply of essential drugs as per specification given in details in the annexures attached to the LoI. In the list of 185 empaneled vendors, the name of the petitioner company figured at Serial no. 185.

6. In the NIT, the terms and conditions for the Framework Agreement were set forth. The relevant terms and conditions were also mentioned in the LoI. It was stated that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top