THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Mousumi Balmiki, W/O- Late Rahul Balmiki – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, North Eastern Frontier Railway Maligaon – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition dismissed for maintainability. (Para 1 , 9) |
| 2. petitioner seeks compassionate appointment. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents argue writ petition is not maintainable. (Para 3) |
| 4. jurisdiction of the central administrative tribunal discussed. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner on call. I have heard Mr. M. R. Adhikari, the learned CGC appearing on behalf of the Respondents.
2. The Petitioner herein has approached this Court by challenging the Speaking Order dated 24.03.2025 passed by the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, N.F. Railway, Lumding and further sought for direction that the application of the Petitioner for compassionate appointment in the Group-D post or any other post be considered.
3. Mr. M. R. Adhikari, the learned CGC appearing on behalf of the Respondents submitted that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. In that regard, he has referred to the Central Administrative Tribunal Rules of Practice, 1993 (for short ‘Rules of 1993’) and more particularly to Rule 154 read with Appendix VI of the said Rules of 1993. The learned CGC also referred to the judgment of the Constitution Ben
The High Court cannot entertain challenges to decisions of the Central Administrative Tribunal; such matters must first be addressed within the Tribunal's jurisdiction per established rules.
Compassionate appointment scheme applicable is that prevalent at employee's death date, not later modifications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.