IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Sheikh Abdullah S/o Late Istanur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 2427 of 2024
Decided On : 05-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges orders affecting school principalship. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondent defends decision based on petitioner's age and conduct. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner asserts eligibility based on qualifications and age compliance. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. overview of parties' arguments and factual findings. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal scrutiny of recruitment criteria and validity of age argument. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. court affirms validity of petitioner's m.a. degree. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. petitioner has a legal right to be principal based on qualifications. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. court orders remand for formal order issuance. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. S.N. Ahmed, for the petitioner and also heard Ms. D. Musahary, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3.
2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order, dated 03-10-2023 (Annexure-F), passed by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam and also the order dated 10-04-2024 (Annexure-I), passed by the Inspector of Schools, NDC Nagaon and also to issue direction to the state respondents, more particularly the respondent No. 2, to allow petitioner to hold charge of the post of Principal of Dakshinpat Higher Secondary School.
3. Notably, vide order dated 03-10-2023 (Annexure-F), the Director of Secondary Education, Assam has allowed the Inspector of Schools (Respondent No. 3), to hold the charge of Principal of the said Higher Secondary School, with financial powers, to draw and disburse the salary of the staff of the school in addition to his normal duties, under F.R. 49 (C). Surprisingly the effect of the order is given from 01-09-2023. And vide impugned order, dated 10-04-2024 (Annexure-I), the Inspector of Schools, NDC, Nagoan has allowed the private respondent No. 4, namely Smt. Anita Laskar to look after the academic affairs of the said school in addition to her normal duties.
Background Facts:-
4. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petition, are adumbrated herein-below:-
“The petitioner was appointed as Asstt. Teacher (Hindi), at Dakshinpat Higher Secondary School of Nagaon District, on 30-04-1991 and he joined on 03-05-1991, and started serving in the aforesaid capacity. He also received graduate pay scale from 01-04-1993, continuously. As per the seniority list of teachers of Dakshinpat Higher Secondary School, prepared by the then Principal of the said school on 14-08-2023, the name of the petitioner appeared at serial No. 1 and said list of seniority was submitted to the Inspector of Schools, as he was to retire on 31- 08-2023, and as there is a requirement of appointing one In-Charge Principal. Thereafter, the name of the petitioner was forwarded to the Inspector of Schools, Nagaon being the senior most teacher, and therefore, he was expecting that he will be allowed to hold the charge of Principal. But, surprisingly on the day of retirement of the erstwhile In-charge Principal, i.e., 31-08-2023, the Inspector of Schools directed one Shri Laba Kanta Sarma, Asst. Teacher of the said school, to look after the academic affairs of the school in addition to his normal duties w.e.f. 01-09-2023, till In-charge Principal is appointed, who is junior to the petitioner, but the petitioner did not object seriously as he was waiting for appointment as In-charge Principal. And while the petitioner was expecting his appointment from the office of the Respondent No.2, very surprisingly, the Director, Secondary Education, Assam, Kahilipara, passed an order, whereby, he has allowed the Inspector of Schools (Respondent no. 3) to hold the charge of Principal of the said Higher Secondary School with financial powers to draw and disburse the salary of the staff of the school in addition to his normal duties, under F.R 49 (C). Surprisingly also the effect of the order is given from 01
The denial of a senior teacher’s claim to principalship due to age and educational qualifications is improper when the criteria are not strictly applied, affirming the need for transparent governance....
The appointment of public officials must adhere to the prescribed procedures and consider all eligible candidates, as per the relevant service rules.
The 'year of recruitment' for determining age eligibility for a promotional post is the year in which the vacancy arises. Once eligibility is established, administrative allegations or disciplinary p....
Degrees from recognized universities cannot be invalidated due to lack of prior permission from authorities; eligibility for principal requires meeting specified educational and service criteria.
A degree obtained by a government employee without prior permission does not invalidate the degree itself, although it may constitute misconduct.
A degree obtained without prior permission does not invalidate its validity; misconduct does not negate educational qualifications essential for employment.
The issuance of writ of quo warranto requires evidence of unlawful usurpation of public office, and retired individuals typically lack standing to contest appointments under statutory rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the respondent authorities to follow the regular appointment process as mandated by the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialis....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.