THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Jakir Hussain Son Of MD. Eyashin Ali - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 4 Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) 3272 / 2024
Decided On : 22-01-2025
(A) Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 - Writ petition challenging the order relieving the petitioner from the post of Principal - Allegations against the petitioner found to be false after inquiry - The Director's order was based on unsubstantiated allegations and did not consider the inquiry report - The court emphasized that the jurisdictional Inspector of Schools could not proceed with further allegations after the inquiry found none against the petitioner. (Paras 24 , 25 , 26 )
(B) Administrative authority - The authority must consider prior inquiry reports before taking action against an employee - The court ruled that the Director's action was not justified as it was based on previously inquired allegations. (Paras 24 , 25 )
Facts of the case:
The petitioner was relieved from the Principal's post based on allegations of misconduct, which were found to be false after an inquiry. The Director's order did not consider the inquiry report that exonerated the petitioner.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the allegations against the petitioner were not sustainable and set aside the order relieving him from his position.
Issues: The main issues were whether the allegations against the petitioner warranted his removal and if the Director's order was justified without considering the inquiry report.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Director's decision lacked justification as it ignored the findings of the inquiry that cleared the petitioner of the allegations.
Result: The order dated 19.06.2024, relieving the petitioner, is set aside, allowing him to continue as Principal.
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Heard Mr. S. K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. U. Sarma, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department, Government of Assam, appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
2. The petitioner by way of instituting the present proceeding, has presented a challenge to the order, dated 19.06.2024, issued by the Director, Secondary Education Department, Assam, relieving him from the charge of the post of the Principal of Krishnai Higher Secondary School, Goalpara.
3. As agreed to by the learned counsels appearing for the parties, this writ petition is taken-up for final hearing and disposal.
4. As projected in the writ petition; the petitioner, herein, was appointed as a Post Graduate Teacher(PGT) in Political Science subject in Krishnai Higher Secondary School, Goalpara, w.e.f. 01.02.2014. After having served for around 8 years in the school, a vacancy having arisen in the post of Principal of the said school; the petitioner was allowed by the jurisdictional Inspector of Schools to hold the academic charge of Krishnai Higher Secondary School, Goalpara vide order, dated 12.04.2022. Thereafter, a proposal was submitted by the jurisdictional Inspector of Schools before the Director, Secondary Education Department, Assam, to permit the petitioner to hold the charge of the post of Principal of the said school. Accordingly, the Director, Secondary Education Department, Assam, vide order, dated 04.07.2023, allowed the petitioner, herein, to hold the charge of the post of Principal of the said school along with financial power.
5. It is to be noted in the writ petition that during the year 2021, while the term of the then School Management and Development Committee was coming to an end, steps were taken for constitution of a new School Management and Development Committee for the said school. Accordingly, in terms of the guidelines existing in the matter; a General Meeting was convened on 29.09.2021. In the said meeting, one Mehabub Ali came to be recommended as the President of the new School Management and Development Committee of the school, in question. However, the jurisdictional Inspector of Schools, vide order, dated 16.12.2022, proceeded to appoint a person, namely, Rabiul Hoque, as the President of the new School Management and Development Committee of the said school. Being aggrieved, said Mehabub Ali had approached this Court by way of instituting a writ petition being WP(c)279/2023, challenging the recommendations so made in favour of said Rabiul Hoque. This Court, vide order, dated 18.01.2023, on examination of the issue arising in the matter, was pleased to suspend the said order, dated 16.12.2022, appointing said Rabiul Hoque as the President of Krishnai Higher Secondary School, Goalpara. It is contended in the writ petition that another person, namely, Rishiraj Das, Assistant Commissioner, Goalpara, was allowed to hold the charge of the post of President of the School Management and Development Committee of the said school.
6. It has been further contended in the writ petition that said Rabiul Hoque was instrumental in lodging of complaints against the petitioner, herein, before various authorities including the Departmental Minister alleging that the petitioner during his tenure as the in-charge Principal of the said school, had collected exorbitant fees from the students of the school and also collected money for allotment of shops constructed illegally inside the campus of the said school and also, the petitioner had published the pre-test result of Class X of the said school twice on 25.10.2023. That apart, in the said complaints, questions were also raised with regard to the educational qualification of the petitioner, herein. The complaints on being so received against the petitioner, the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner had directed for an inquiry in the matter thro
The administrative authority must consider prior inquiry findings before taking action against an employee; failure to do so renders the action unjustified.
The 'year of recruitment' for determining age eligibility for a promotional post is the year in which the vacancy arises. Once eligibility is established, administrative allegations or disciplinary p....
The denial of a senior teacher’s claim to principalship due to age and educational qualifications is improper when the criteria are not strictly applied, affirming the need for transparent governance....
The appointment of public officials must adhere to the prescribed procedures and consider all eligible candidates, as per the relevant service rules.
Procedural violations and lack of natural justice in disciplinary inquiries invalidate actions against the affected party.
The refusal to hand over charge of Officiating Principal was arbitrary and constituted legal malice, as the petitioner was exonerated of previous charges.
Procedural compliance with Regulations 35 to 37 of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act is essential in conducting inquiry proceedings and issuing termination orders.
Employment and Service matter - Post of Lecturer - Petitioner has been superannuated he may not be permitted to hold post of officiating Principal but he shall continue in service as Lecturer till co....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner, as a teacher in a private school, was entitled to receive salary and continuity of service for the period she worked, and t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.