SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 2212

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Shri Hementa Kumar Nath Son Of Banamali Nath And Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam Reresented By The Principal Secretary To The Govt Of Assam And Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) 6324 of 2025
Decided On : 10-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. KN Choudhury, Senior Advocate, Ms. RR Kakati Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. N Bora, Standing Counsel, P, RD Department Mr. S Dutta, Senior Advocate, Mr. DA Kaiyyum

The court ruled that no lowest rate for bids is mandated by applicable rules, allowing a tender to be settled below the three-year average.

Headnote:(A) Assam Panchayat (Financial) Rules, 2002 - Rule 47(1) - Tender settlement - Petitioners challenge the settlement of Balisatra Half-weekly market at Rs.66,23,866/- alleging violation of Clause 12 of the Tender Notice dated 07.06.2025 and the Continuation Notice dated 16.06.2025 - The court interprets Clause 12 and finds no requirement for the rate to fall between the average of the last three years’ settlement and a 10% increase - Petitioners did not participate in the tender and lack locus standi as interlopers. (Paras 4, 12, 19)

Table of Content
1. tender settlement dispute regarding balisatra market. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. petitioners' challenge based on tender interpretation. (Para 8 , 9)
3. defendants argue lack of standing for petitioners. (Para 10 , 11)
4. court's interpretation of tender terms and rules. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

Heard Mr. KN Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. RR Kakati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Ms. N Bora, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the P & RD Department and Mr. Surajit Dutta, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. DA Kaiyyum, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the private respondent No.5.

2. The petitioners herein are aggrieved by the settlement made in respect of Balisatra Half weekly market dated 22.09.2025 in favour of the respondent No.5 at an amount of Rs.66,23,866/- on the ground that the rate at which the respondent No.5 have been granted the settlement is contrary to Clause 12 of the Tender Notice dated 07.06.2025 and the continuation Notice dated 16.06.2025.

3. Taking into account that the dispute involved relates to interpretation of the terms of the Tender Notice and Rule 47(1) of the Assam Panchayat (Financial) Rules 2002, (for short, ‘the Rules of 2002’), this Court issues Rule, returnable forthwith as all the respondents are duly represented.

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Nagaon Zilla Parishad had issued a Tender Notice dated 07.06.2025 for settlement of various markets under the Nagaon Zilla Parishad for a period of one year i.e. from 2025-26 with effect from 01.07.2025 to 30.06.2026. The market, in question, which is the subject matter of present adjudication is Balisatra Half-weekly market (for short, hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the market in question’), wherein the Government value of the said market in question was mentioned as Rs.83,00,410.00p and the earnest money deposit to be Rs.8,30,041.00p. The term of the said Tender Notice which has led to the present dispute in question is Clause 12. The translated portion of the same as certified by the petitioners’ counsel to be the true translation reads as under:

“12. In respect of tender for all Bazar/Ghat, the tender offering highest value at the rate of the average of settlement value of previous three years along with an increase within the cap of 10% on three years average value will be accepted for consideration.”

5. Pursuant to the said Tender Notice, a Continuation Notice was issued on 16.06.2025. In terms with the said Continuation Notice, the three years settlement value as well as the average of the three years settled value of all the markets, to be settled by the Tender Notice dated 07.06.2025 by the Office of the Nagaon Zilla Parishad were mentioned. In addition to that the 10% increase thereon was also mentioned. The said Continuation Notice being relevant is reproduced hereinunder. The below reproduction of the Continuation Notice is the translated copy which was certified to be the correct translation by the petitioners’ counsel is as under:

“Notice

34. It is hereby notified that the three-years average of the government value of the markets for which tender for settlement has been invited by the office of Nagaon Zilla Parishad vide Notice No.NZP-708/Hat/Beel/2025-26/2345-35 dated 07/06/2025, and 10% increase thereon are as follows for the purpose of inviting tenders from interested bidders:

Name of the market2022-232023-242024-25Average value 10% increase
123456
Kothiatoll Half-weekly market14009992599999.002599999.002200332.002420366.00
Juria Half- weekly1215000.00 1338000.001338000.001297000.001426700.00
market
Shantijan Half-weekly market7321103.008700000.008700000.008240368.009064404.00
Balisatra Half-weekly market1,40,01,05015200000.0015200000.0014800350.016280385.00
Rupahi weekly market4671999.004661111.004661111.004664740.005131214.00

It is mentioned here that the tenders o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top