IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
Doymoy Daveng Chakma S/o Bhadra Sen Chakma – Appellant
Versus
Chakma Autonomous District Council and Another – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 47 of 2024
Decided On : 11-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner eligibility for loan under specific rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's counsel argument on entitlement to increased loan amount. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court acknowledges financial constraints on loan disbursement. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's directive for timely loan sanctioning. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
1. Heard Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondents.
This is a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of the appropriate writ or direction to the respondents being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to avail loan amount to him as per Rule 17 (1) (a) (b) of the Chakma Autonomous District Council (Salaries, Allowances & Pensions of Members) Rules, 2003.
2. Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was elected as member of the Chakma Autonomous District Council from the 15th Rengkashya, MDC Constituency on 19.05.2023. The petitioner being an elected member of the Chakma Autonomous District Council filed an application under Rule 17 (1) of the Chakma Autonomous District Council (Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members) Rules, 2023 for granting of loan amounting to Rs. 3 lakhs (Rupees three lakhs only) for the construction of houses and loan advance of Rs. 3 lakhs (Rupees three lakhs only) for the purchase of Motor Vehicle as per his entitlement under the said Chakma Autonomous District Council (Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members) Rules, 2023 on 02.06.2023.
3. Thereafter, the Chairman of Chakma Autonomous District Council constituted a committee of Privileges of Members of Chakma Autonomous District Council which held a meeting on 12.07.2023 wherein, the terms and conditions in respect of sanctioning loans to the members of Chakma Autonomous District Council was considered. One of the terms and conditions provided that a member/applicant shall execute a deed of undertaking in the prescribe format, undertaking to use the loan for the purpose for which it is sanctioned. However, since no steps have been taken till date for sanctioning any loan amount to the petitioner the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for regularization of his entitlement as per the Chakma Autonomous District Council Rules (Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members) Rules, 2023.
4. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner being an elected member of the Chakma Autonomous District Council may be granted loan in terms of the Chakma Autonomous District Council Rules (Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members) (Third Amendment) Rules, 2023 wherein, the entitlement to the loan amount has increased from Rs. 3 lakhs (Rupees Three Lakhs only) to Rs. 10 lakhs (Rupees 10 Lakhs only) each for the construction of house and loan advance for the purchase of Motor Vehicle under the said Rule 17 (1) (a) (b) of the Chakma Autonomous District Council (Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members) Amended Rules, 2023. In support of his submission the learned counsel for the respondents has relied on the Judgments of the Apex Court in the State of Mizoram and Anr. Vs. Mizoram Engineering Service Association and Anr. /b>. (2004) 6 SCC 218 and All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India , 2024 INSC 26.
5. Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents are not adverse to granting loan to the petitioner in terms of his entitlement under the Chakma Autonomous District Council (Salaries, Allowances and Pensions of Members) Amended Rules, 2023.
6. However, the concerned respondents at present are not having any sufficient funds to grant the loan amount as applied for by the petitioner, he submitted that the only reason why the loans cannot be sanctioned at the stage by the Chakma Autonomous District Council is due to lack of funds and that the sanction
AI
Elected members of the Chakma Autonomous District Council are entitled to loans as per amended rules, necessitating action by the council despite current financial constraints.
Point of law: The preamble of the impugned Act no doubt does speak of the necessity to make provisions with respect to "transfer, allotment, occupation or use of land for any purpose likely to promot....
The 2003 Amendment Rules allowing dual membership of both the District Council and State Legislative Assembly are constitutional, as no express prohibition is found in the Constitution's 6th Schedule....
Governors can impose rule under discretionary powers for political stability, even if it contradicts council advice, as per the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.
The Governor's unilateral action in declaring the previous Chief Executive Member's appointment null was invalid, lacking required adherence to the Lai Autonomous District Council Rules, 2010, and a ....
Court may direct public authorities to consider applications and representations within a reasonable time.
The withholding of PF loans by an employer based on financial hardship is arbitrary and violates employee rights under Article 300 A.
Under Rule 25 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, financial dependency, including for adult children, disqualifies individuals from membership to prevent multiple land allotments within familie....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.