Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Jonathan Lalremkima, S/o Sh. C. Lalmuanpuia – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram, The Secretary, Home Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Mazumdar, J.
Heard Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the appellant and also heard Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Addl. P.P for the State.
2. This matter was heard at length on 18.11.2025 and the judgment & order was reserved.
Proceedings leading to the appeal:
3. The case emanates from an FIR lodged with the Officer-in-Charge, Lunglei Police Station informing that the husband of the informant was beaten up by an unknown miscreant at Farm Veng, Pu Bawka Point and that he was taken to the hospital at Lunglei. When the informant reached the hospital, the husband of the informant was unconscious and despite best efforts of the Doctors to resuscitate him, he succumbed to his injuries on 15.03.2021 at around 12:25 A.M. A request was made to find out the miscreant who is behind the death of the husband of the informant and take action against him.
4. The case was registered as Lunglei P.S Case No. 33/2021 dated 15.03.2021 under section 302 IPC and investigation was carried out. The accused was arrested on 15.03.2021 and the final report/charge-sheet was filed by the Investigation Officer on 23.08.2021. During the trial, 9 prosecution witnesses were examined. The learned
Conviction modified to Section 304 A IPC as prosecution failed to prove that the accused acted with intent or knowledge to cause death; incident deemed accidental.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 304 IPC to determine the guilt of the accused for causing fatal injuries leading to the death of the deceased.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on ocular evidence, admission of presence, and post-mortem report to establish the appellant's involvement in the assault, leading to ....
The court modified the conviction from murder to voluntary grievous hurt under section 325 IPC, ruling that the accused lacked the intent to kill despite causing death due to the victim's injuries du....
If an offence takes place inside privacy of a house and in such circumstances where assailants have all opportunity to plan and commit offence at time and in circumstances of their choice, it will be....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide under Section 299 IPC and the offence under Part II of Section 304 IPC, based on the presence of intentio....
A conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC was adjusted to culpable homicide under Section 304 due to ambiguities in witness accounts and lack of intent, establishing a precedent for interpreting ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
