Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Amit Murah, S/o. Lt. Chanu Murah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Rep. By Pp, Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. Zothankhuma, J.
1. Heard Mr. N.J. Das, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel and Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, assisted by Ms. R. Das, learned advocate for the State.
2. The appellant has put to challenge the impugned judgment dated 08.06.2020 passed by the learned Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC- 1) at Margherita, Tinsukia, in Sessions Case No.83(M)/2016, by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC for killing his wife and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, with a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand), in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for another 6 (six) months.
3. The Prosecution case in brief is that the informant (PW-1) submitted an FIR dated 22.10.2015 to the Officer-in-Charge of the Pengaree Police Station, Tinsukia, stating that the appellant, who resides at the informant’s Bijulibar Tea Garden Line started beating his wife since 4 p.m. The informant further learnt from his neighbours as well as the appellant that the deceased had been assaulted till 10 p.m. On going to the house of the deceased in the morning, he found her dead. Pursuant to
Circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession, when corroborated by testimony, can support a conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.
Circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confessions can sustain a murder conviction, provided they form a complete chain, even without eyewitness testimony.
The burden of proof in a criminal case lies on the prosecution, but in cases of circumstantial evidence, the burden on the accused to provide a cogent explanation is lighter. Motive and conduct are r....
The court ruled that reliance on police confessions for conviction is barred under Section 25 of the Evidence Act, necessitating complete circumstantial evidence for conviction.
Drunkenness does not absolve murder liability; intention to kill is assessed based on evidence, including circumstantial evidence of injuries indicating guilt.
The court relied on circumstantial evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and the nature of the injuries to establish the guilt of the accused under IPC 302.
Circumstantial evidence, coupled with a lack of alibi or credible explanation from the appellant, sufficiently establishes guilt in a murder conviction under Section 302 IPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on circumstantial evidence, the shift of burden of proof to the appellant, and the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions in esta....
A confessional statement made voluntarily and corroborated by other evidence can be relied upon for conviction even if it is retracted during the trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
