Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Nizara Thakur Wife Of Late Siba Prasad Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Higher Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Mazumdar, J.
1.Heard Ms P. Barman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr D. Upamanyu, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department, and Mr P.J. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4. Mr R.K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General, appears for the respondent No.5.
2.By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the Communication dated 03.03.2023 issued by the Additional Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of Higher Education, by which the application of the petitioner for the grant of family pension for the services rendered by her late husband as Lecturer has been declined. It is the case of the petitioner that family pension is admissible to her under the relevant provisions of the Assam College Employees (Provincialization) Act, 2005, which has been amended by the Assam College Employees (Provincialization) (Amendment) Act, 2012, and the Assam College Employees (Provincialization) (Amendment) Act, 2020.
3.This Court has heard the learned counsel for the contesting parties and also gone through the various undisputed records ann
The court affirmed that the provisions for family pensions apply retroactively to deceased employees if conditions are fulfilled, reflecting principles of equity and social justice.
Family pension is a legal entitlement for the families of deceased employees, applicable even if the deceased retired prior to the law's introduction, provided conditions of refunding CPF are met.
The court determined that employees who superannuated at 58 years under the Assam College Employees (Provincialization) Act, 2005, are not entitled to pensionary benefits beyond superannuation pensio....
The denial of family pension based on unreasonable deductions of service years violates legal principles of fairness; unmarried dependent daughters are entitled to pension as per amended Rule 143.
Family pension cannot be granted if the deceased was not in government service at the time of death, as per applicable pension rules.
Point of Law : Entitlement of family pension to a mother would either be from the date of filing of the application or from the date of coming into force of the amendment, whichever is later.
The computation of pension must consider the entire length of service from the initial appointment date, not just the provincialization date.
Provincialized employees are entitled to pension benefits based on their entire length of service, not just the period post-provincialization.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
