SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 506

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KALYAN RAI SURANA, ANJAN MONI KALITA, JJ.
Ali Akbar, S/o. Late Abdul Jalil – Petitioner 
Versus
The Union Of India, Rep. By The Secretary, Home Affairs And Ors. – Respondents 
WP(C) No.4397 of 2019
Decided On : 06-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.C. Das, Mr S.C. Das
For the Respondent: Asstt.S.G.I., SC, NRC, SC, F.T, SC, Election Commission.

The court affirmed that citizenship claims must be substantiated by credible documents demonstrating lineage to ancestors present in India prior to 1971, rejecting mere assertions.

Headnote:(A) Foreigners Act, 1946 - Section 9 - Opinion determining foreign status - Petitioner declared as Foreigner for entering Assam post 1971 - No cogent evidence linking Petitioner to Indian forebears prior to cut-off date - Rejection of various documents as insufficient for citizenship proof. (Paras 3, 12-22)

(B) The presumption of Indian citizenship rests on adequate documentation proving lineage to ancestors present in India before 1971 - Mere oral assertions without corroborative evidence are insufficient for establishing citizenship. (Paras 19, 22)

(C) Writ petition challenged the Tribunal's opinion on citizenship, asserting lineage through maternal and paternal grandparents, ultimately dismissed. (Paras 10, 23)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner claimed Indian citizenship based on documentation including electoral rolls and family lineage. However, the Tribunal found insufficient linkage to established ancestors before the cut-off date.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal’s opinion rejecting the Petitioner as foreigner is upheld due to lack of valid evidence supporting citizenship claim.

Issues: The key issues included the absence of proof connecting the Petitioner to Indian lineage pre-1971, and the reliability of documents presented.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Petitioner failed to produce credible evidence/records to establish a link to his claimed ancestors, affirming the Tribunal's decision on foreigner status.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner asserts citizenship from lineage and documents. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. testimonies support petitioner’s claims of citizenship. (Para 6 , 7)
3. counsel argues lineage ties to mother and maternal grandfather. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. opposition argues lack of credible evidence for citizenship. (Para 11 , 12)
5. court evaluates evidence, confirms tribunal's rejection. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. electoral rolls and documents evaluated but lack links to citizenship. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. court maintains tribunal's decision due to insufficient evidence. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
8. court dismisses the writ petition, upholding the tribunal's ruling. (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

A.M. Kalita, J.

Heard Mr. R.C. Das, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned CGC; Mr. A. I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, ECI; Mr. P. Sarma, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate as well as Ms. A.Verma, learned Standing Counsel, F.T. and Border matters.

2. The Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition assailing the Opinion dated 27.03.2019, in F.T. (8) Case No. 3640/18 (Ref. TZP (B) F.T. Case No. 20/18), passed by the learned Foreigners’ Tribunal (In short, the Tribunal) No. 8, Tezpur, whereby the learned Tribunal opined the Petitioner/Proceedee to be a Foreigner who entered Assam on or after 25.03.1971.

3. The instant case was forwarded by the Superintendent of Police (B), Sonitpur, vide Reference TZP (B) F.T. Case No. 20/18, expressing doubt about the validity of the Petitioner, namely, Md. Ali Akbar with a prayer to decide as to whether the Petitioner is or, is not a Bangladeshi national. The aforesaid reference was registered as F.T. (8) Case No. 3640/18 on 13.06.2018. After receipt of the notice, the Petitioner appeared before the learned F.T and filed his written statement. Thereafter, the Petitioner deposed himself as DW-1, DW-2 is the mother of the Petitioner, i.e., Nechabi Khatun, DW-3 is the maternal uncle of the Petitioner, namely, Md. Abdul Rahman, DW-4 is the Gaon Bura, namely, Sri Kanak Karmakar, DW-5 is the RMO, Election Office, Tezpur, namely, Prabhat Bora, DW-6 is the Govt. Gaonbura of Lakhupara and Sialmari village, namely, Usuf Ansari, DW-7 is the Gaon Panchayat Secretary, namely, Jagadish Deka and DW-8 is the Sr. Asstt., Sr. Sub-Registrar Office, namely, Gagan Bania.

4. The Petitioner has exhibited the following documents in support of his defence and pleaded himself not to be a Foreigner but, an Indian national: -

EXT. 1 is the NRC of 1951.

EXT. 2 is the Sale Deed.

EXT. 3 is the Sale Deed.

EXT. 4 is the voter list of 1965.

EXT. 5 is the voter list of 1971.

EXT. 6 is the voter list of 1975. EXT. 7 is the voter list of 1997. EXT. 8 is the voter list of 2010.

EXT. 9 is the voter ID.

EXT. 10 is the Affidavit.

EXT. 11 is the Gaonburah Certificate. EXT. 12 is the Gaonburah Certificate. EXT. 13 is the Land Revenue Receipt.

EXT. 14 is the Marriage Link Certificate.

5. The Petitioner’s case in his written statement is that the Petitioner is a genuine citizen of India by birth. The names of the Petitioner’s parents are Late Abdul Jalil and Musstt. Nechabi Khatun and they originally resided at village Bhergaon, P.S. Dhekiajuli, now Thelamara, District Sonitpur, Assam, wherein the Petitioner’s father name appeared in the NRC Legacy Data in the year 1951. The Petitioner is the only son of Late Abdul Jalil. His father died during his childhood, therefore, his father’s name never appeared in the Voters’ list of 1966 and thereafter, after the death of his father, the Petitioner’s mother, namely, Mustt. Nechabi Khatun came to stay in the house of his maternal grandfather, namely, Late Intaj Ali at village Kalakuchi, P.S. Missamari, District-Sonitpur, Assam. The Petitioner’s maternal grandfather, Late Intaj Ali purchased a plot of land by a registered Sale Deed on 04.02.1949. The paternal grandfather of the Petitioner was Late Adam Kha, who originally resided at village Khelmati, District Sonitpur, Assam and he pos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top