THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Manish Choudhury, J.
Joy Kumar Hazam, S/o Late Shibnarayan Hazam - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam to be represented by the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Foods & Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department – Respondent
W.P.[C]. No. 4346 of 2024
Decided On : 17-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of fair price shop licenses (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. process of handling show cause replies (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments regarding cancellation validity (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. legal basis for license cancellation (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. need for recording reasons in administrative orders (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. implications of non-speaking orders (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. conclusion of writ petition (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The two petitioners have joined together to institute the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail a common Order dated 06.11.2023 passed by the respondent no. 4, that is, the Sub-Divisional Officer [Civil], Lakhipur, Cachar whereby the Fair Price Shop [FPS] licenses issued to the petitioners under the Assam Public Distribution of Articles [APDA] Order, 1982 have been cancelled with immediate effect.
2. The two petitioners were holders of Fair Price Shops [FPS] licenses and they both were retailers under M/s Jiri-Fulertal Gaon Panchayat Samabay Samittee [GPSS]. On the basis of a public complaint regarding non-distribution of NFSA rice an inspection was carried out in the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner no. 1 on 08.06.2023 and a few rice bags were seized. A similar inspection was also carried out in the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner no. 2 on 08.06.2023 and a few rice bags were seized. By executing zimmanamas of even date, the seized rice bags were again given in the custody of the petitioners by the respondent no. 6 on undertakings from the petitioners that they would not dispose of the seized rice without an order of the Area Officer and would keep the seized rice in good condition. Subsequently on 12.06.2023, the respondent no. 6 vide an Office Order of even date, allowed the petitioners to distribute the seized NFSA rice to the beneficiaries with immediate effect in the interest of the general consumers.
3. On 15.06.2023, the respondent no. 5 passed two Orders whereby the FPS licenses of the two petitioners were suspended with immediate effect and their consumers were tagged with the respective nearest Fair Price Shop.
4. In respect of the petitioner no. 1, the Order of Suspension dated 15.06.2023 had inter alia mentioned that it was reported that the petitioner no. 1, a retailer under M/s Jiri-Fulertal GPSS, did not distribute NFSA rice in the month of June, 2023 to the consumers till 08.06.2023 though he received the rice on 03.05.2023. It was mentioned that the petitioner no. 1 intended to divert the allotted rice for personal gain and he did not maintain stock register of allotted articles. The petitioner no. 1 had failed to hang the beneficiary list in his Fair Price Shop [FPS] and he also failed to submit the monthly performance reports. It was mentioned that the petitioner no. 1 had thereby, contravened the provisions of Clause 6[4] of the PDS [Control] Order, 2001; Clauses 18, 20 & 21 of the APDA Order, 1982; and violated the Clauses 3[a], 4, 5 & 8[1] of the terms and conditions of the FPS license under the APDA Order, 1982. While suspending the FPS license of petitioner no. 1 by Order dated 15.06.2023, he was also asked to show cause as to why his FPS license should not be cancelled for violation of the afore-stated clauses of the FPS License and the provisions of the APDA Order, 1982. The petitioner no. 1 was directed to file his show cause reply within a period of ten days therefrom.
5. By the Order of Suspension dated 15.06.2023, the petitioner no. 2 was informed that it was reported that he, a FPS retailer under M/s Jiri-Fulertal GPSS, received the NFSA rice for the month of June, 2023 on 05.06.2023. While other FPS licenses lifted the same in the first week of May, 2023, the petitioner no. 2 collected the rice from other sources on 07.06.2023. It was mentioned that the petitioner no. 2 intended to divert the allotted rice for personal gain. He also did not display stock and price board in his Fair Price Shop [
Licensing Authority must provide specific reasons in cancellation orders; non-speaking orders violate principles of natural justice and are unsustainable in law.
A suspended license under the Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order must have timely cancellation proceedings initiated within 90 days; otherwise, the suspension becomes invalid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the licensee of a fair price shop is required to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of the license and the provisions of the Control ....
The cancellation of a fair-price-shop license is invalid if the authority that conducted the inquiry also decides the merits of the case, violating procedural requirements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the Licensing Authority to provide reasoned decisions, consider specific pleas and evidence, and adhere to principles of natura....
Fair price shop licenses cannot be cancelled without conducting a proper inquiry and adhering to principles of natural justice, including providing a show cause notice and opportunity to respond.
Public distribution system – Cancellation of licence - Cancellation of Absence of reasoning as to the mandatory requirement of provision which conferred jurisdiction on the quasi judicial authority o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.