THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Md Anowar Hussain Son Of Late Jabbar Ali - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No.6548 of 2025
Decided On : 06-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. state liability to compensate for vehicles hired for law and order duties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. admission of statutory liability for unpaid dues in a formal affidavit. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial mandate ensuring timely payment of admitted financial obligations. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents.
2. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is a registered owner of vehicles bearing registration No.AS-01-HC- 6697 (Bus), AS-01-HC-6500 (Bus), AS-25-CC-5020 (Bolero), AS-01- H-6697 (Bus), AS-25-H-8030 (Scorpio), AS-01-DC-4693 (Truck) and AS-25-J-0001 (Innova) respectively which were hired by the Respondents on different dates in the year 2023-2025 for the purpose of maintaining law and order situation in Kamrup District and also released on different dates after utilizing the same for different periods of days. The Petitioner submitted his bills after release of his vehicles amounting to Rs.58,57,571/-. However, the said amount has not been disbursed to the Petitioner till date.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner has been pursuing the matter diligently with the Respondents, but the Respondent Authorities have not shown any interest in making the payment of the admitted amount of Rs.58,57,571/- due to the Petitioner for which the Petitioner is facing hardship. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that the Respondent Authorities have failed to discharge their duty in accordance with law and the same has caused prejudice to the Petitioner. Hence, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition.
4. Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents has placed before this Court an affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No.6. From a perusal of the said affidavit- in-opposition, it is seen that the Respondent Authorities have admitted their liability of an amount of Rs.58,57,571/-. The details can be seen in paragraph Nos.4 & 5 of the said affidavit-in-opposition which being relevant is reproduced herein under:-
“4. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph-4 of the writ petition the deponent begs to state that the vehicles were hired for different periods for emergency situation, i.e. maintaining law & order situation etc. in Kamrup District as follows:
The Deponent begs to state that total bill amount of the Petitioner is Rs.58,57,571/- (Rupees Fifty Eight Lakh Fifty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Seventy One) only.
5. That with regards to the statements made in paragraph No. 5 of the writ petition, the deponent begs to state that the proposal of total bill amount Rs.58,57,571/- (Rupees Fifty Eight Lakh Fifty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Seventy One) only has been already submitted to Assam Police Headquarter vide office Memo No. KMP/MT/Hire-Veh/2026/728 dated 28-01-2026 for sanctioning fund, however, no fund has been received from Assam Police Headquarter to pay the petitioner. The Deponent further begs to state that as soon as funds are received, the bill amount shall be paid to the petitioner without doing any delay.
A copy of the letter dated 28-01-2026 is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE-A.”
5. Upon perusal of the materials on record, and more particularly the paragraphs quoted above, it would be seen that the Respondents therefore admit that the petitioner is entitled to the amount of Rs.58,57,571/-. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following observations and directions:-
i) The petitioner is entitled to the amount of Rs.58,57,571/-as admitted by the Respondents.
ii) The said amount of Rs.58,57,571/- be paid to the petitioner within a period of 6 (six) months from the date, a certified copy of the instant order is served upon the respondent No.3, i.e. the Director Genera
Where state authorities admit liability for outstanding payments due for services rendered, the court may issue directions for the disbursement of such funds within a specified period to ensure the f....
Where state authorities explicitly admit to a financial liability for services rendered, the court may exercise its jurisdiction to direct the timely disbursement of the admitted amount to the claima....
When state authorities admit liability for services rendered, they are obligated to discharge the debt. The court may exercise writ jurisdiction to direct the payment of such admitted outstanding due....
Authorities' acknowledgment of liability mandates timely payment to prevent undue hardship, affirming the obligation to discharge public duties effectively.
Where state authorities admit liability for services rendered, the court may exercise its writ jurisdiction to direct the disbursement of the admitted amount within a specified timeframe to ensure th....
Government authorities are liable to timely disburse admitted amounts for services rendered, ensuring accountability and reducing prejudice against service providers.
Government authorities must comply with contractual obligations by ensuring timely payment for services rendered, preventing undue hardship on service providers.
Government authorities must ensure timely payment of acknowledged financial dues to prevent undue hardship to petitioners.
The court affirmed that an accepted payment claim creates an obligation on authorities to disburse the amount promptly to avoid undue hardship to the claimant.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.