SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 613

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Md Lutfur Rahman Son Of Late Jabbar Ali - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No. 6552 of 2025
Decided On : 06-05-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. K. Gogoi, Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate

Where state authorities explicitly admit to a financial liability for services rendered, the court may exercise its jurisdiction to direct the timely disbursement of the admitted amount to the claimant, ensuring the fulfillment of state obligations and preventing prejudice to the service provider.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - Recovery of admitted dues - State liability - Where the respondent authorities admit the liability for payment of bills for services rendered, the court may issue directions for the disbursement of the admitted amount within a specified timeframe to prevent prejudice to the service provider. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a vehicle owner, provided vehicles for official use during emergency situations. Despite submitting bills for the services rendered, the authorities failed to disburse the payment. The authorities subsequently filed an affidavit admitting the total outstanding liability and confirming that the proposal for payment had been submitted for sanctioning.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the respondents explicitly admitted the liability for the total amount claimed. Consequently, the court directed the authorities to settle the payment within a period of six months from the date of service of the order.

Issues: Whether the court can issue directions for the payment of admitted dues when the respondent authorities have acknowledged the liability but failed to disburse the funds.

Ratio Decidendi: When state authorities admit to a specific financial liability for services rendered, the court is justified in exercising its jurisdiction to ensure the timely discharge of such admitted obligations, thereby preventing undue hardship to the service provider.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions for payment.

Table of Content
1. legal representation and court proceedings commencement. (Para 1)
2. claim for unpaid contractual vehicle hire services and resulting hardship. (Para 2 , 3)
3. state respondent's admission of liability for admitted debt. (Para 4)
4. judicial order for time-bound disbursement of admitted payment. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

Heard Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents.

2. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is a registered owner of vehicles bearing registration No.AS-25-BC-3934 (Bolero), AS-25-G-7213 (Bolero), and AS-25-CC-5036 (Bolero) respectively which were hired by the Respondents on different dates in the year 2023-2025 for the purpose of maintaining law and order situation in Kamrup District and also released on different dates after utilizing the same for different periods. The Petitioner submitted his bills after release of his vehicles amounting to Rs.22,39,855/-. However, the said amount has not been disbursed to the Petitioner till date.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner has been pursuing the matter diligently with the Respondents, but the Respondent Authorities have not shown any interest in making the payment of the admitted amount of Rs.22,39,855/- due to the Petitioner for which the Petitioner is facing hardship. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that the Respondent Authorities have failed to discharge their duty in accordance with law and the same has caused prejudice to the Petitioner. Hence, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition.

4. Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents has placed before this Court an affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No.6. From a perusal of the said affidavit- in-opposition, it is seen that the Respondent Authorities have admitted their liability of an amount of Rs.22,39,855/-. The details can be seen in paragraph Nos.4 & 5 of the said affidavit-in-opposition which being relevant is reproduced herein under:-

“4. That with regard to the statements made in paragraph-4 of the writ petition, the deponent begs to state that the vehicles were hired for different periods for emergency situation, i.e. maintaining law & order situation etc. in Kamrup District as indicated below:

The Deponent begs to state that the total bill amount of the Petitioner is Rs.22,39,855/- (Twenty two lakhs thirty nine thousand eight hundred fifty five rupees) only.

5. That with regards to the statements made in paragraph No. 5 of the writ petition, the deponent begs to state that the proposal of total bill amount Rs.22,39,855/- (Rupees Twenty Two Lakhs Thirty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Five) only has been already submitted to Assam Police Headquarter vide office Memo No. KMP/MT/Hire-Veh/2026/729 dated 28-01-2026 for sanctioning fund, however no fund has been received from Assam Police Headquarter to pay the petitioner. The Deponent further begs to state that as soon as funds are received, the bill amount shall be paid to the petitioner without doing any delay. A copy of the letter dated 28.01.2026 is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE-A.”

5. Upon perusal of the materials on record, and more particularly the paragraphs quoted above, it would be seen that the Respondents therefore admit that the petitioner is entitled to the amount of Rs.22,39,855/-. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following observations and directions:-

i) The petitioner is entitled to the amount of Rs.22,39,855/- as admitted by the Respondents.

ii) The said amount of Rs.22,39,855/- be paid to the petitioner within a period of 6 (six) months from the date, a certified copy of the instant order is served upon the respondent No.3, i.e. the Director General of Police, Assam, Ulubari, Guwahati.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top