Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, SHAMIMA JAHAN
Rasida Khatun W/o Anowar Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual evidence provided by petitioner to the foreigners' tribunal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding the sufficiency of oral evidence vs. documentary proof of citizenship linkage. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. burden of proof under section 9 of the foreigners' act; inadmissibility of unproved documents and sole oral testimony for linkage. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. limitations of certiorari jurisdiction in reviewing findings of fact; dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
(Shamima Jahan, J.)
Heard Mr. A.S.Tapadar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. G.Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Home Department, Mr. P. Sarma,learned Government Advocate, Assam, Mr N Kalita, learned counsel representing Mr. A. I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel for the ECI; Ms A Gayan, learned CGC appearing for the Union of India.
2. By this application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the opinion dated 13.09.2018, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners’ Tribunal, Assam;Barpeta 11th,
In citizenship proceedings, the burden of proof lies solely on the individual. Oral testimony of relatives, without corroborating admissible documentary evidence, is insufficient to establish linkage....
The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish citizenship, which was not met due to insufficient evidence linking her to her claimed lineage.
The burden of proof for citizenship lies with the individual asserting it, requiring credible evidence to substantiate claims.
In citizenship proceedings, the burden of proof lies on the proceedee to establish a direct bloodline connection to an Indian ancestor. Identity documents are not conclusive proof of citizenship, and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proper evaluation and appreciation of evidence in determining citizenship claims, as well as the application of the burden of pro....
In citizenship determination proceedings, the burden of proof lies on the individual to establish ancestral linkage through consistent, corroborated documentary evidence. Mere production of documents....
Learned Tribunal is required to re-examine the issue by taking into consideration explanation offered by petitioner about discrepancy and pass a fresh opinion as regards citizenship status of petitio....
The burden of proof to establish citizenship lies on the individual, and reliable and cogent documentary evidence is required to prove citizenship.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
