IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Hasanur Rahman, S/o. Late Muzammel Hoque – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam. Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Assam – Respondent
Judgment :
Kaushik Goswami, J.
Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent, and Mr. B. Haldar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2.
2] This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20.02.2023 and the order of sentence dated 21.02.2023 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Kokrajhar (hereinafter referred to as the “trial court”) in Sessions Case No. T1/19/2019, whereby the accused/appellant was convicted under Sections 302 and 498- A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with fine.
3] The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 16.03.2018, information was received at Kazigaon Police Station that the deceased had allegedly committed suicide by hanging. Upon receipt of such information, a G.D. entry was made and the police visited the place of occurrence, where the dead body was found lying on the veranda of the house.
4] Subsequently, an FIR was lodged by the father of the deceased, leading to registration of Kazigaon P.S. Case No. 16/2018 under Sections 498-A/302 of the Indian Pe
Balvir Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
Reena Hazarika v. State of Assam
In cases of circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of events excluding all hypotheses of innocence. Section 106 of the Evidence Act does not shift the burden of proo....
The main legal point established is the requirement to fully establish circumstances in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the need for corroborating medical reports with other evidence, and the....
(1) Section 106 of Evidence Act does not directly operate against either a husband or wife staying under same roof and being last person seen with deceased.(2) In a case of circumstantial evidence, m....
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Section 302, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain, proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the accused providing an adeq....
If a person is last seen with the deceased, in that case regarding the death of the deceased, he must offer an explanation which is probable and satisfactory. If he does so, then it will be held that....
(1) Murder – If in a case based on circumstantial evidence, accused evades response to an incriminating question or offers a response which is not true, such a response, in itself, would become an ad....
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : R. P. Gupta For the Respondent : C. P. Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.