SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 685

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Kardak Ete, J.
Safiya Khatun W/O Ashek Ali – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Chief Secretary And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 4479 of 2025
Decided On : 05-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr G U Ahmed, Ms S. Mehjabin, Mr. R Islam
For the Respondent: GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE, SC, REVENUE

Ex-gratia compensation under disaster response fund guidelines is strictly limited to deaths directly caused by specified natural calamities. An accidental death, such as drowning in a pond, does not qualify for such relief unless a direct nexus with a notified natural calamity is established.

Headnote:(A) Disaster Management - State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) - Notification dated 27.07.2011 - Ex-gratia compensation - Death due to drowning - Requirement of nexus with specified natural calamities - Petitioner sought financial assistance for the death of a minor due to drowning - Authorities contended that the death was accidental and not caused by any natural calamity - Court held that for availing gratuitous relief, the death must be directly attributable to one of the specified natural calamities - In the absence of evidence linking the death to a notified calamity, the claim for ex-gratia is not maintainable. (Paras 2, 6, 10, 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought ex-gratia compensation following the death of a minor relative due to drowning. The petitioner claimed the death occurred during a flood, invoking a government notification providing relief for victims of natural calamities. The respondents submitted reports indicating the death was an accidental drowning in a pond and that no flood or natural calamity occurred in the area at the time.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the guidelines governing the disaster response fund are restricted to specific natural calamities. As the evidence confirmed the death was an accidental drowning unrelated to any notified calamity, the petitioner failed to establish the necessary criteria for the grant of ex-gratia payment.

Issues: Whether the death of a minor due to accidental drowning in a pond, in the absence of a natural calamity, entitles the legal heir to ex-gratia compensation under the state disaster response fund guidelines.

Ratio Decidendi: Gratuitous relief under the disaster response fund is strictly limited to deaths directly attributable to specified natural calamities. Without proof that the incident was caused by a notified calamity, the claim for financial assistance cannot be sustained.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of facts and claims regarding ex-gratia compensation for accidental death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. adversarial arguments concerning causality between death and natural calamity. (Para 5 , 7)
3. interpretation of sdrf guidelines limiting relief to specific natural calamities. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. application of sdrf norms; causality not established; dismissal of petition. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

KARDAK ETE, J.

Heard Mr. G. U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Goswami, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 4 to 7 and Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, for respondent No. 2.

2. By filing this petition, the petitioner claims rehabilitation grant/compensation/financial assistance in terms of the notification dated 27.07.2011 issued by the Government of Assam, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, a guideline/policy providing, immediate relief to victims of cyclone, drought, earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, hailstorm, landslide, avalanche, cloudburst and pest attack, on account of the death of her granddaughter, Late Afrina Begum, who died due to drowning.

3. The case in brief is that information was received on 03.09.2024 at around 6:00 PM from an unknown person of village Owana, Rupahihat, Nagaon, by the police that a two-year-old baby girl had died due to drowning. On enquiry, it was found that at around 3:00 PM, Late Afrina Begum, aged about two years, daughter of Ruhul Amin of village Owana, Police Station Rupahihat, District Nagaon, had died after falling into a pond while she was playing. Thereafter, necessary inquest was conducted and post-mortem examination was carried out, wherein the cause of death was opined to be asphyxia as a result of drowning.

4. The present petitioner is the grandmother of the deceased Late Afrina Begum. The petitioner contends that since her late granddaughter had died in the pond due to onslaught of thunderstorm and flood, she is entitled to be provided the rehabilitation grant as per the policy of the State. The petitioner claims to be a very poor lady having no one to look after her and she has been suffering from financial difficulties and the respondent authorities are duty bound to extend financial help to the family of the victim who had died due to drowning during flood. The petitioner had submitted a representation on 18.12.2024 before the Deputy Commissioner, Nagaon, praying for financial assistance against the unnatural death of her granddaughter as she had died due to drowning during the flood. However, the respondent authorities have failed to consider the petitioner’s genuine grievance for financial grant.

5. Mr. G. U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring to the notification dated 27.07.2011, which provides immediate relief to victims of cyclone, drought, earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, hailstorm, landslide, avalanche, cloudburst and pest attack, submits that a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) per deceased is payable as ex-gratia compensation to the families of deceased persons. He submits that the granddaughter of the petitioner, who was about three years old, had died due to drowning in a pond during thunderstorm and flood, therefore the petitioner is entitled to the aforesaid amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) as ex-gratia payment under the said notification. Accordingly, it is prayed that the respondent authorities be directed to grant ex-gratia payment of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) to the petitioner. In support of his submissions, the learned counsel, Mr. Ahmed, has referred to the certificate of the Officer-in- Charge, Rupahihat Police Station, as well as the post-mortem examination report, which state that the deceased granddaughter of the petitioner died due to drowning and that the cause of death was asphyxia as a result of drowning. 6. On the other hand, Mr. N. Goswami, learned State Counsel, and Ms. G. Haza

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top