THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
M/S Win Power Infracon LLP, Represented By Shri Amrendra Kumar Tiwari And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Assam Power Distribution Company Limited, Represented By Its Managing Director And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/1632 of 2026
Decided On : 07-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procurement terms and bid capacity calculation requirements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 2. sequence of events leading to bid rejection. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 3. petitioner's contention on contractual status and arbitrariness. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 4. respondent's position on loi status and technical essentiality. (Para 42 , 43) |
| 5. a letter of intent is an inchoate precursor, not a contract. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 6. allowing late submission of essential terms violates article 14 fairness. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed, no merit in challenge. (Para 64) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. K.K. Mahanta, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K.M. Mahanta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners. Mr. K.P. Pathak, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners assailing the Speaking Order bearing Letter No. CGM (D&S)/APDCL/LAR/HPCL, Kamardanga/2025-26/88 dated 09.03.2026, as well as the Notice Inviting Tender/Re-tender vide NIT dated 10.03.2026, published on 11.03.2026, and seeking other consequential directions.
BRIEF FACTS
3. The brief facts which led to the filing of the present writ petition are that the Respondent No. 1 through the Chief General Manager (D&S), APDCL issued a Notice Inviting Tender dated 11.09.2025 for “Construction of 33 kV Dedicated Feeder from 220 kV Salakati GSS to HPCL Project at Kamardanga under Basugaon ESD under Deposit Work Scheme on Full Turnkey Mode. The estimated cost of the project was Rs. 12,49,12,131/- and the period for completion of the said project was 180 days from the date of issuance of the work order. The said Bid Document contained various Sections.
4. Section-I to the Bid Document is the Notice Inviting Tender which stipulated the Tender Download Start Date to be 12.09.2025; Pre-Bid Meeting Date up to 14:00 Hrs. on 16.09.2025; Bid Submission Start date on 19.09.2025; Bid Submission End Date up to 16:00 hours on 25.09.2025 and the Technical Bid Opening Date on 26.09.2025. It is categorically mentioned in Note No. 2 of Section-I of the Bid Document that the bids must be submitted electronically through e-Tender portal www.assamtenders.gov.in in 2 (two) parts as Techno-Commercial bid and Price bid. Apart from that, a copy of the technical bid has to be submitted in a sealed envelope subscribing: a) Tender No; b) Name of the bidder with full address. It further stipulated that only bidders who were found acceptable in Part-I Bid (technical) with adequate bid capacity, shall be considered for opening of the Price bid. The date and time of opening of the Part-II Bid (Price) shall be communicated to those bidders whose bids are qualified for opening.
5. Section-II of the Bid Document is with the heading “Tender Inviting Proposal”. The said Section-II contains various terms and conditions. Clause 5 of Section-II stipulated the “Basic Qualifying Requirements”. Sub-Clause A of Clause 5 of Section-II is in relation to “Technical”; Sub-Clause B of Clause 5 of Section-II relates to “Financial” and Sub-Clause C of Clause 5 of Section-II is the “Bid Capacity”. Clause 6 of Section-II stipulates the requirement of entering into an Agreement by the successful bidder within 7 (seven) days from the date of issuance of the detailed work order (LoA), failing which, the LoA shall be treated as cancelled without further communication from APDCL. Clause 6 of Section-II of the Bid Document being relevant is reproduced herein under:
“6. Agreement:
The successful bidders shall have to enter into an agreement with APDCL within 7(seven) days from the date of issue of detailed work order (LOA) failing which the LOA shall be treated as cancelled without further communication from A
A letter of intent is a precursor to a contract and does not create a binding legal relationship. Mandatory tender conditions, such as bid capacity, must be satisfied at the time of bid submission; a....
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to essential tender conditions and minimal judicial interference in matters of government contracts, upholding the Tender Committee's decision to rejec....
Judicial review in tender matters is limited to assessing procedural fairness, not the merits of the tender conditions, which are determined by the tendering authority.
The court upheld the authority's discretion in evaluating tender bids, emphasizing the need for compliance with mandatory conditions and the absence of arbitrariness in disqualification decisions.
The court upheld the tendering authority's discretion in setting eligibility criteria, emphasizing limited judicial review focused on procedural fairness rather than the merits of the decision.
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in contractual matters and the deference to be given to the interpretation of the tender document by the author. It also clarified that the w....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.