Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Meghmallar Estates And Services – Appellant
Versus
Kishore Kumar Das – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background involving breach of contract and property allotment disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. procedural history and consolidation of appeal and cross-objections. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. determination of necessary parties under order 1 rule 10 cpc. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. interest calculation on refund of payments based on contractual clauses and section 56 of the indian contract act. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. evaluation of fraud claims and eligibility for damages in contracts for illegal objects. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. final orders modifying the degree concerning interest amounts. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, J.
Heard Mr. N. Baruah, learned counsel for the appellant in RFA No. 116/2017 and respondent in CO No. 15/2018. Also heard Mr. B.D. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in RFA No. 116/2017 and objector in CO No. 15/2018.
2. The present respondent, as plaintiff, had instituted a suit for specific performance of contract, permanent injunction, alternatively for recovery of money and compensation, etc.
3. This appeal has been preferred against the
The court emphasized the necessity of demonstrating the existence of a contract for specific performance and the importance of proper evidence, including original documents.
Court is conscious of its limitation while exercising jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code. Unless the findings are so perverse, the same cannot be accepted, the Court would not....
Specific performance of a contract for the sale of immovable property can be granted even if the final layout has not been sanctioned, provided the plaintiff has proven the existence of the agreement....
The court upheld the principle that undertaking given to secure performance of contractual obligations revives a terminated contract, allowing specific performance claims despite prior termination by....
Specific performance requires all parties' consent in an agreement; plaintiffs must prove readiness and willingness to fulfill contractual obligations.
Misrepresentation in a contract does not render it void, but voidable at the option of the defrauded party. Section 64 of the Indian Contract Act imposes an obligation to refund the consideration upo....
The plaintiff bears the burden of proof to establish the existence of a valid agreement, failing which claims for specific performance will be dismissed, as per evidentiary standards.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
