IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Lotus Logistics and Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Evertop Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. By this Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Petitioner has sought invalidation of the Arbitral Award dated 16 August 2024 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator. By the impugned Award, the Arbitral Tribunal has directed Petitioner to have the building plans amended and approved in consonance with the sanctioned plan dated 17 September 2008 for the purpose of issuance of occupation certificate for the building. The Tribunal has directed the Petitioner to take all necessary steps for procurement of occupation certificate for wing ‘A’ building in accordance with building plans sanctioned on 17 September 2008. In the event of non-grant of occupation certificate in respect of wing ‘A’ building, the Tribunal has directed the Petitioner to take steps to get the area shown as ‘open to sky ducts’ in the living rooms and bedrooms, regularaised at its cost within three months of rejection of application for occupation certificate. In the event of non-grant of occupation certificate and rejection of regularisation of ‘A’ wing building, Petitioner is directed to pay to the Respondent-Society sum of Rs.128,98,00,000/- wit
P.T. Prem Raj Vs. D.L.F. Housing and Construction (Private) Ltd. and Another
State of Kerala Vs. Cochin Chemical Engineers Ltd.
Gayatri Balasamy Vs. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited
Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad and Others Vs. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad (Dead) through LRs. and Others
The court upheld the principle that undertaking given to secure performance of contractual obligations revives a terminated contract, allowing specific performance claims despite prior termination by....
A valid contract for specific performance must have certainty regarding price, parties, property, and terms; lack of clarity renders the agreement void.
Section 34 limits interference with arbitral awards to root perversity; plausible denial of specific performance upheld despite illegal termination, as developer not ready to deliver essential redeve....
Upon valid termination of redevelopment agreement for developer's breaches, no-damages clause bars compensation but society must restore purchase price of utilized FSI/tit-bit land as 'benefit' under....
The execution of a Development Agreement is essential for binding contractual rights, and compliance with timelines specified in earlier agreements is necessary for specific performance claims under ....
The findings of the Arbitrator, that the claimants are not entitled to damages from the respondents; the breach of the MOU on the part of the KMDA, recorded before the Arbitrator, are sustainable and....
Court is conscious of its limitation while exercising jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code. Unless the findings are so perverse, the same cannot be accepted, the Court would not....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.