IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Kalyan Rai Surana, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Fatema Bidhaba - Review Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India represented by the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi - Respondent
Review Petition No. 68 of 2021
Decided On : 26-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of procedural history and factual evidence presented before the tribunal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. contentions regarding admissibility of new evidence and reliance on nrc in review petitions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. judicial assessment of documentary evidence and applicability of settled legal precedents. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. strict parameters for maintaining review jurisdiction based on apparent errors. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. formal dismissal of the review petition. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
Soumitra Saikia, J.
This review petition is directed against the order dated 10.11.2020 passed in WP(C) No. 1906 of 2020. By the said order, the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the opinion dated 29.11.2019 passed in FT. Case No. (Bpt/11th) 1910/2017 rendered by the Member, Foreigners’ Tribunal No. 11, Barpeta, declaring the petitioner to be a foreigner/illegal migrant who had entered Assam on or after 25.03.1971, was affirmed and the writ petition was dismissed.
2. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner contested the reference by filing written statements and supporting documents. The case projected before the Tribunal was that she was born in 1966 at Village Pota under Sarupeta Revenue Circle of Barpeta district. Her parents’ names were Abdul Kader Ali and Moyful Nessa and her grandmother’s name was Hazera Bewa. She had produced copies of the electoral Rolls for the years 1965, 1970, 1989, wherein the names of her parents and grandmother names are found recorded as voter. She was married on 01.10.1983 to Abdul Rajjak of village Haldia Gaon, P.S. Kalgachia District Barpeta, Assam and for the first time, her name was recorded as a voter in the year 1985 along with her husband in respect of village Haldia under 44 No. Jania LAC. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner examined two witnesses—herself as DW-1 and one Abul Kalam Ahmed as D.W-2, who was projected as her brother.
3. On these documents and evidences adduced, the petitioner contested her case and urged before the Tribunal that the reference against her was uncalled for, and that she being a citizen of India, the same should be answered in her favour.
4. Before the Tribunal, the petitioner produced the extracts of electoral Rolls for the year 1965 and 1970, whereby names of Abdul Kader Ali, son of Kader Ali, and Mayful Nessa, wife of Abdul Kader Ali, and Hazera Bibi, wife of Sagar Ali, who were projected as the father, mother and grandfather respectively were recorded as voters and were shown to be residents of village Pota under No 48 Bhawanipur LAC. They were exhibited before the Tribunal as Exhibit 1 and 2. Thereafter, electoral Rolls for the year 1985, 1997 and 2017 were exhibited as Exhibits 3, 4 and 5.
5. Exhibit 3, which is the electoral Roll of 1985 recorded the name of Fatima Khatun and her husband Abdul Rajjak as voters whereas Exhibit 4 pertaining to Electoral Roll of 1997 recorded the name of petitioner as a voter and Exhibit 5 pertaining to the electoral Roll of 2017 recorded the name of the review petitioner and her two sons, Farman Ali and Saman Ali, and Rahina Khatun, wife of Saman Ali.
6. Exhibit 6 was the extract of the electoral Roll of 2018 in respect of Village Pota under No. 41 Bhawanipur LAC pertaining to one Abdul Kalam Ahmed, son of Abdul Kader (62) and his wife Nur Nehar Ahmed (52) whom the petitioner projected as her brother and sister-in-law.
7. Exhibit 7 is the certificate issued by the Secretary 108 No. Majgaon Gaon Panchayat vide dated 12.10.2015 countersigned by the BDO, Howly certifying that Srimati Fatema Bidhaba aged about 52 years old, daughter of late Abdul Kader and Mayful Nessa of Pota village & 108 No. Majgaon Gaon Panchayat under Sarupeta Revenue Circle of Barpeta District of Assam was a resident within the jurisdiction of the said Gaon Panchayat and who got married on 01.01.1983 to late Abdur Rajjak, who was the son of late Juran Fakir a
Food Corporation of India Vs. Assam State Cooperative Marketing & Consumer Federation Ltd and Ors
Md. Siraj Ali @ Chiraj Ali and Ors Vs. The Union of India
Abdul Kuddus vs. Union of India
Review jurisdiction is restricted to correcting patent errors or addressing newly discovered evidence unavailable through due diligence. It cannot be used to re-argue settled issues, and registry inc....
The High Court by invoking its inherent powers, can always pass adequate orders to correct such errors that appear to be apparent on the face of the record.
The court reaffirmed that the burden of proof lies with the petitioners to establish their citizenship, emphasizing the limited scope of review jurisdiction.
Review petitions in citizenship cases require new evidence or errors apparent on record, not mere re-hearing of previous arguments.
Learned Tribunal is required to re-examine the issue by taking into consideration explanation offered by petitioner about discrepancy and pass a fresh opinion as regards citizenship status of petitio....
The burden of proof to establish citizenship lies on the individual, and reliable and cogent documentary evidence is required to prove citizenship.
The burden of proving citizenship lies with the individual claiming it, and mere oral testimony is inadequate without corroborating documentary evidence.
A review petition must show an error apparent on the record or new evidence; the burden of proof for citizenship lies with the petitioner under the Foreigners Act.
In citizenship proceedings, the statutory burden of proof rests entirely on the individual to provide consistent and corroborated documentary evidence. Oral testimony, when contradictory or unsupport....
A foreigner's status must be proven by credible and verifiable evidence linking them to claimed Indian ancestors; mere appearances in voter rolls are insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.