SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 1036

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
Monmoth Kumar Paul S/o. LT. Chitta Ranjan Paul And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam Rep. By The Principal Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Revenue Deptt. And Ors. - Respondents
WP(C)/723 of 2019
Decided On : 21-04-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri P.K. Roy, Sr. Advocate, Ms. S. Dasgupta, Advocate,: Mr. N Dhar, Ms. S D Gupta, Mr. S K Chakraborty, Mr. S P Choudhury, Mr. T U Laskar, Ms. S Dasgupta, Mrs. U Baruah
For the Respondent: Shri B.J. Talukdar, G.A., Assam, Shri A. Bhattacharjee, S.C., Revenue, Ms. P.R. Mahanta, S.C., Education.

The statutory framework mandates that acquired lands in the possession of occupancy tenants or raiyats must be settled with those individuals. Public interest projects must be harmoniously balanced to ensure construction does not infringe upon the established legal rights and possession of such statutory occupants.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Land Acquisition - Settlement of acquired land with persons in occupation under specific state legislation - Statutory mandates require that acquired land in occupation of a raiyat shall be settled with the occupant - Legal definitions of encumbrances exclude the rights of raiyats and tenants - Occupancy rights must be given precedence over governmental allotment - Writ jurisdiction requires a harmonious construction when public projects are near completion while legal claims of occupants exist. (Paras 4, 13, 14, 16)

(B) Writ jurisdiction - Scope of judicial review in land matters - Where an impugned allotment overlaps with lands in possession of legal occupants, the latter's vested rights under statute cannot be extinguished by executive action - The court will protect existing possession while balancing public interest in ongoing infrastructure developments. (Paras 12, 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged an order proposing land allotment for an educational institution, asserting their rights to the land as tenants or raiyats under the relevant acquisition legislation. The petitioners claimed they were in long-standing possession and entitled to the settlement of the land under the statute. The respondents contended that the project was a public necessity and the allotted area did not conflict with the petitioners' holdings.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the construction was largely complete. Due to the finding that the majority of the contested land was distinct from the specific plots in the petitioners' possession, the court held that the project could proceed without interfering with the petitioners' statutory rights.

Issues: Whether individuals in possession as tenants or raiyats are legally entitled to the settlement of land under the governing statutory framework and whether the state can allot such land for public projects despite competing occupancy claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the law as mandating the settlement of acquired land with occupants who hold valid tenant or raiyat status. Because the statutory provisions exclude the rights of such occupants from deemed encumbrances, the government is legally obligated to prioritize the rights of these occupants, and any allotment must be balanced against these specific protected interests.

Result: Writ petition disposed of, directing that the construction may continue while safeguarding the petitioners' rights under the relevant statutory provisions.

Table of Content
1. basis of writ petition seeking protection and land settlement rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners' claims derived from tenancy rights under the 1959 act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. state clarification regarding land possession and public project status. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. legal priority of occupancy tenants under state acquisition act. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. harmonious balancing of public construction and tenant rights protection. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.

Seven petitioners have joined together in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

“Under the circumstances stated above it is most humbly prayed that your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records and issue a Rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why:-

A) A writ in the nature of certiorari shall not be issued in setting aside and quashing the impugned letter dated 26.10.2018 (Annexure-8) issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj: district, Karimganj, regarding allotment of the said plots of land in possession of the petitioners, in favour of the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, for establishment of the Govt's college over the said plots of land. and/or;

B) A writ in the nature of mandamus shall not be issued directing the respondent authorities for settlement of the land in possession of the petitioners as tenants under the Makunda Baptist Mid-Mission in Karimganj district in favour of the petitioners under section 15 of the Assam State Acquisition of Lands belonging to Religious or Charitable Institution of Public Nature Act, 1959, and not to take forcible possession of the land in possession of the petitioners without recourse to the due process of law. and/or;

C) Such further and other orders shall not be passed as your Lordships may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice; and.,

D) To make the Rule absolute on perusal of records and after hearing the parties to the case.

Pending disposal of the Rule issued the respondent authorities may kindly be directed not to evict the petitioners from the land in their possession in pursuant to the impugned letter dated 26.10.2018 (Annexure-8) issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj district, Karimganj, without recourse to the due process of law.”

2. As per the facts projected, land measuring about 31 bigha, 10 katha, 2 chatak covered by Dag No. 335, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 347, 348, 349, 351, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 359, 361, 570, 571, 572, and 576, K.P. Patta No. 1 situated at Village and Mouza-Makundarbond originally belonged to the Makund Baptist Mid-Mission in the district of Karimganj and the said land was acquired under the provision of the Assam State Acquisition of Lands belonging to Religious or Charitable Institution of Public Nature Act, 1959 (hereinafter Act). The petitioners claim that their predecessors were in possession of the land as raiyats/tenants under the Makunda Baptist Mid- Mission and were issued khatians in the year 1977 onwards by the Settlement Officer, Karimganj. It is thus claimed that the petitioners were entitled to the settlement of the land in accordance with Section 15 of the Act. The petitioners claim to be in possession of the land since then. However, vide the impugned order dated 26.10.2018 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj, necessary approval of the Government was sought for allotment of the land for establishment of a Government Model College. Hence, the present petition.

3. I have heard Shri P.K. Roy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. S. Dasgupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. I have also heard Shri B.J. Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel and Addl. Sr. Government Advocate, Assam; Shri A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, Assam and Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department.

4. Shri Roy, learned Sen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top