SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 526

The Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
J. Rajmohan Pillai – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sivarajan, J.

The Incometax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench at the instance of the Revenue has referred the following question of law as per direction issued by this Court in the judgment dated 5.10.1999 in O.P.No. 22075 of 1999 for decision by this court.

“Whether, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of Rule 6DD(j) of the Incometax Rules apply to the facts of the case, vis-à -vis section 40A(3) of the Incometax Act?â€

2. The brief facts are as follows. The assessee is an exporter of cashew kernels. The assessee, during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1990-91, had ‘purchased raw cashewnuts from various places including the State of Orissa and the same was transported to the assessee’s factories in Kanyakumari for processing. In the assessment for the year 1990-1991 the assessee claimed deduction of a total sum of Rs. 10,98,698/- as transport and coolie charges for transporting raw cashewnuts. The assessing officer held that out of the said expenses payment of Rs. 10,28, 350,/- had to be subjected to the provisions of Sec.40A (3) by the Act as the payments were made otherwise than by way of crossed cheques or bank drafts. Sinc






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top