SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 206

Mary – Appellant
Versus
Pappu – Respondent


Judgment :-

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.

A.S.700 of 1999 was an appeal filed by the defendant in a suit for specific performance. The suit was decreed by the trial court. When the matter came up for admission, the plaintiff-respondent who had appeared submitted that the appeal itself may be heard and a decision taken one way or the other. With the consent of both the parties, the appeal itself was then heard after giving counsel time to get ready. By judgment and decree dt.14.12.1999 the appeal was dismissed finding that the trial court was right in granting a decree. This petition is filed by the defendant-appellant for a review of the judgment.

2. The only ground raised in the petition for review is that the appeal A.S.700 of 1999 ought not to have been heard by a Division Bench. According to counsel, by the Division Bench hearing the appeal the appellant was deprived of the opportunity of filing Letters Patent Appeal under S.5(ii) of the High Court Act and this amounts to discrimination. The further contention raised is that by virtue of the amendment of the Civil Courts Act raising appellate jurisdiction of the District Court to Rs. 2 lakhs, there is an implied repeal of the Kerala H







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top