SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 71

ANTONY DOMINIC
G. Bindu. , w/o. B. Sunilkumar – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Public Service Commission – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Liji J. Vadakedom, Kaleeswaram Raj, Shyson P. Manguzha, K. Siju, S. Sudheeshkar, Mrs. Bindu George, Babu S. Nair, R. Ramadas, Babu Karukapadath, Mrs. M.A. Vaheeda Babu, K.A. Noushad, P.G. Pramod, N. Sugathan, Mrs. Varsha Bhaskar, Franco, T.J., V.C. Madhavankutty, Mrs. Chincy Gopakumar, Mrs. C.G. Preetha, M.G. Karthikeyan, Nireesh Mathew, T.A. Unnikrishnan, K.S. Praveen, M. Shaju Purushothaman, K.S. Rajesh, Sandeep Gopalakrishnan, Shaji Thomas Porkkattil, N. Nagaresh, Binu Paul, T.V. Vinu, C.A. Sadasivan, Joy P. Jose, K.N. Krishnan Namboothiri, C.V. Sasi, Alexander George, Suman Chakravarthy, G. Harikrishnan, P. Deepak, Mrs. K.R. Rija, N. Raghunath, Jinu Joseph, Rajesh Nambiar, Rajesh Cherian, T.K. Girijan, Vincent Joseph, Mrs. K.S. Sabitha, M. Sasindran, A. Arunkumar, Dinny Thomas, Thomas J. Anakkallunkal, Anil K. Narendran, T.P. Sajan, M. Mohammed Navaz, Jeemon K. Abraham, Suresh Kumar Kodoth, Mrs. Hemalatha, A. Mohamed Mustaque, K.R. Avinash (Kunnath), K.P. Sudheer, Sumodh Madhavan Nair, M.K. Pradeepkumar, K. Jaju Babu, Mrs. M.U. Vijayalakshmi, T.R. Sadeesan, T.S. Shyam Prasanth, Mrs. Divya Chandran, C.P. Saji, Abi Antony, Johnson Manayani, Benhur Joseph Manayani, Mrs. S.L. Sylaja, N. Sasidharan Unnithan, K.V. Anil Kumar, Ajith Murali, P. Ramakrishnan, V.A. Muhammed, M. Sajjad, A.K. Abdul Azeez, Renjit George, Liju V. Stephen, Eby Augustine, Mrs. Indu Susan Jacob, N. Anilkumar, Liju, M.P., Baby Mathew, P. Samsudin, E.M. Unnikrishnan (Manjeri), K.C. Antony Mathew, Dr. K.P. Satheesan, M.R. Jayaprasad, P. Mohandas (Ernakulam), Mathew Sunny, Anoop V. Nair, S. Renjith, Mrs. K. Tresa Rani George, P.V. George (Puthiyidam), H. Badaruddin, Mrs. B. Shameera, Shaji Thomas, Shine Mathews (Vadakkekara), R. Surendran, V. Venugopal, T.C. Suresh Menon, U. Balagangadharan, P. Ramakrishnan, Binoy Vasudevan, R. Manikantan, B. Ashok Shenoy, S. Shanavas Khan, N. Vimalan, Jacob Sebastian & Jawahar Jose, Advocates.
For the Respondents: P.C. Sasidharan, (S.C. for K.P.S.C.) & Mrs. Sanjeetha, Government Pleader.

Judgment :

Petitioners in these writ petitions are claiming the benefit of Rule 5A of the Kerala State & Subordinate Services Rules (Hereinafter referred to as the "Rules" for short). In WP(C) No.11650/11, there is also an alternative prayer to declare the Rule unconstitutional.

2. Issues raised being common, these cases were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment.

3. The background in which these litigations arise is that by G.O(P) No.5/1993 dt 15.1.1993, Rule 5A was inserted in the Rules, which read as under;

"Where the method of recruitment to any service, class or category is by direct recruitment on district wise basis, such of the candidates belonging to that district who qualify for the interview/become qualified to be included in the ranked list for such of the district-wise posts mentioned in the Annexure to this rule shall be given a weightage of five marks for the selection.

Provided that the candidates who are eligible to get the above weightage marks shall produce along with the application a nativity certificate issued by a competent authority not below the rank of Tahsildar of the concerned Taluk".

(Annexure is omitted)

4. The Explanatory Note





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top